...attracted as apparently Sam Harris is a big macher in atheism, not that there's necessarily ...) The Ontological Argument: Descartes's Version - Kant's Objection: 'Existence' Is Not...The Ontological Argument: St. Anselm's Version - Gaunilo's Objection: The Greatest Island... Argument from Evil: The Probability Version - Objection: Evidence Available to Human ...

Robert Cohen wrote: This article is too boring for this "agnostic Jew," though real philosophy students could be attracted as apparently Sam Harris is a big macher in atheism, not that there's necessarily anythingggg wrongggg with thattttt <of course there . http://www.tnr.com/doc....

This article is too boring for this "agnostic Jew," though real philosophy students could be attracted as apparently Sam Harris is a big macher in atheism, not that there's necessarily anythingggg wrongggg with thattttt <of course there . http://www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml?i=20061218&s=wood121806&c=1

...) existence of "psi" adds weight to my tendency toward agnosticism. Can you cite something. Randi hasn't yet given out his million dollars to my knowledge. If one's atheism categorically denies the possibilty or any probability of an unknown(s), then I just can't respect such absolutism. There is no denial of anything. Only the acknowledgment of the lack ...

... (or spacely) existence of "psi" adds weight to my tendency toward agnosticism. If one's atheism categorically denies the possibilty or any probability of an unknown(s), then I just can't respect such absolutism. That's a theist strawman version of what an atheist is. There is nothing in disbelief which requires absolute certainty. (Just as ...

... (or spacely) existence of "psi" adds weight to my tendency toward agnosticism. Can you cite something. Randi hasn't yet given out his million dollars to my knowledge. If one's atheism categorically denies the possibilty or any probability of an unknown(s), then I just can't respect such absolutism. There is no denial of anything. Only the acknowledgment of the lack of any...

... earthly (or spacely) existence of "psi" adds weight to my tendency toward agnosticism. If one's atheism categorically denies the possibilty or any probability of an unknown(s), then I just can't respect such absolutism. That's a theist strawman version of what an atheist is. There is nothing in disbelief which requires absolute certainty. (Just as there ...

Robert Cohen wrote: I've been interestted since childhood in the (apparent) b.s., so it will never go away that I think it may be reality Some memories of psychic claims: In the 1950s, DUNNINGER, tv network psychic on Saturday nights prior to Jackie Gleason. He read an audience member's mind, opened safes. The first time I really got interested in such. 1960s, ...

i accept whatever is reasonable, because i think it can get too absurdist to argue semantics, as these mini-debates often seem to be about pickinf' nits, petti-fogging, and bad faith i dropped from law school when i realized that was too much of what it is aqbout please do not enlighten me (warp me) such is what philosophy is much about too i'll take "all the above" on "proof" and ...

Robert Cohen wrote: A few aspects that continue to affect my perceptions: The existence of another dimension, as per in the today "chic" ideas of "string theory," could seemingly eventually provide indication or proof of a "super-natural" or a "deity." Can you define "proof" as your using it here?