On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 05:58:03 -0700 (PDT), clamato <clamato@operamail.com> wrote: On Aug 21, 7:28 am, Diana <diana...@notachance.com> wrote: On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 19:00:28 -0700 (PDT), clamato <clam...@operamail.com> wrote: <snip to Well, we're going to disagree about OED and dictionaries in general. Let me address your specific point about
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 19:00:28 -0700 (PDT), clamato <clamato@operamail.com> wrote: <snip to Well, we're going to disagree about OED and dictionaries in general. Let me address your specific point about theists as antitheists. " It's about the idea that a THEIST can be anti-theist. He can't. As long as one believes in a deity, and is a theist, he cannot then be against
On Aug 20, 8:22 pm, Diana <diana...@notachance.com> wrote: On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 13:45:36 -0700 (PDT), modematic <modema...@operamail.com> wrote: <snip to Whatever you are, you are not a lexographer. You are not a theist, and you don't know what you are talking about. As to what the OED claims for itself, the introduction to the dictionary is on line
On Jul 14, 11:11 am, caspar.milquetoast...@hotmail.com wrote: < This is a microscopic photo of the interior of one of the key human fossils discovered by Ed Conrad between coal veins in Northeast Pennsylvania's anthracite region. < The late Wilton M. Krogman, one of the world's foremos human anatomists and author of "The Human Skeleton in Forensic Medicine," had examined it
