On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 19:12:06 -0700 (PDT), earlcolby.pottinger@sympatico.ca wrote: On Sep 19, 4:07 pm, glen herrmannsfeldt <g...@ugcs.caltech.edu> wrote: That's interesting. I think a 12-bit converter directly connected to the 12 MSB's of a 16-bit recording shouldn't be THAT bad, even with some of the most dynamic orchestral music. First, the sound quality is not that
In message <mjdkc4l182ovt4lqehie6i5kqc7g1v34vd@4ax.com>, Colin Irvine <look@bottom.of.home.page> writes On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 10:09:11 +0100, Bear <bastardDOTbear@gmail.com> squeezed out the following: In article <4d01250b-109e-4bab-b4ea- 6da60e84e86d@l43g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>, antonye says... Bear wrote: I think I'm getting better as I get older ... the return leg
In message <7a33eaf3-523e-49d1-a189-13238b744ba9@s50g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>, darsy <darsyx@gmail.com> writes On Sep 11, 10:45 pm, wessie <putmynameh...@tesco.net> wrote: Bear <bastardDOTb...@gmail.com> wrote in news:MPG.23339d73103f7e4798a353 @news.individual.de: <puts hand Arse. Still, postponed by a week isn't too bad. Tell you what though
Bear wrote: In article <xn0fv329c1s4q0001@news.individual.net>, CT says... Didn't it take them up to six months to get fully operational after the last fire? Strewth, really? Apparently so, but that's "fully operational". I can't find any details on how quickly they got at least some semblance of service running though. But hey-ho; I've got travel insurance, so
in article a6jgc453rrvdn71ojld0pog65q1mivoi5l@4ax.com, David G. Imber at imber@maniform.com wrote on 11/09/08 9:02 AM: On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 17:38:39 +0000, Larry <noone@home.com> wrote: Let's hold the childish name calling for a second How about forever? Don't you guys ever feel rather cheated while browsing things you cannot see or trying to play some
