...have a problem on trying to define an array with eight dimensions. I tried the following: ... the array cannot have more than seven dimensions. I'm working under gfortran version 4.3... a problem where I needed a 4 dimensional matrix in COBOL. The Univac reps said ... and had no problem with a 4 dimensional matrix. (I always refered to arrays and matrices, which bugged them.) Just make...

...:36, mfor...@hotmail.com wrote: I have a problem on trying to define an array with eight dimensions. [...] , but i get an error when compiling that the array cannot have more than seven dimensions. I'm working under gfortran version 4.3.0 . Another possibility than the suggestions by Richard and Damian is to use gfortran 4.4, which supports ...

... compiling that the array cannot have more than seven dimensions. That'... with something like 2 7-dimensional arrays. 2. You can have ... to map onto all the possible values of the 2 original...the base of the 1D array required to retrieve the desired...in a formula as type(array) :: a complex :: val val = element...write procedures for initializing the array, printing it, etc. All this...

... problem on trying to define an array with eight dimensions. I tried the ... when compiling that the array cannot have more than seven dimensions. That's...by with something like 2 7-dimensional arrays. 2. You can have an... that is in turn an array. There is some awkwardness in this... to map onto all the possible values of the 2 original ... as the slice had no more than 7 dimensions. The f2003 ...

Hello. I have a problem on trying to define an array with eight dimensions. I tried the following: integer :: N=10 complex,dimension(-N:N,-N:N,0:...1,-N:N,-N:N,0:1,0:1) :: P , but i get an error when compiling that the array cannot have more than seven dimensions. I'm working under gfortran version 4.3.0 . Thank you for any recommendation on what to do, or suggestion...

mforets@hotmail.com wrote: Hello. I have a problem on trying to define an array with eight dimensions. I tried the following: integer :: N=10 complex,dimension(-N:N,-N:N,0:1,0:1,-N:N,-N:N,0:1,0:1) :: P Easiest is to make the last and 0:3 and then reference it with 2*(I)+(J) where (I) and (J) are the value of the next to last and last desired subscript....

... inevitability of the process--nothing more, nothing less, nothing else: And ...a thermodynamic "potential" for "work." More aptly: "for motion" ... replacing the...conserving themselves into larger/slower (more dispersed) ones. As far as...echoes back out like 3-dimensional ripples following the dropping of...our universe where life is possible.] By definition, an indivisible body...