Ms04
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
 Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...
found 212 articles for 0.306 sec
"PSO" <PSO@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:E08362D7-F572-4DB0-893E-42A84A7857AE@microsoft.com... > Hi everyone, I hope someone can help me. I was cleaning up my WSUS and > this > problem popped up. Does anyone have information on a replacement of > MS04-045 > (KB870763) or why it has become invalid for Windows 2000 Server. > > Many thanks for your help! > If you look     

Group: microsoft.public.security · Group Profile · Search for Ms04 in microsoft.public.security
Author: Roger Abell [MVP]
Date: Jul 17, 2007 10:11

Since updating the November cab files for my offline servers i have been receiving notice that MS04-004 is not installed. This seems like a false positive since i have many later cumulative IE updates including now 06-067 as shown below. I only see it on Win 2K Can someone confirm why this might be happening? I am investigating whether it is related to systems that do not have the hot
Show full article (0.59Kb) · Show article thread
With this months' monthly catalog release, we resolved the problem with MS04-025 incorrectly reporting that it was needed. Unfortunately, MBSA and SMS ITMU will now report that MS04-004 is needed. This is a recurrence of the same issue and will be fixed in a future update of the WSUSSCN2.CAB file for use with MBSA 2.0.1 and SMS ITMU. The older MS04-004 and MS04-025 security updates are cumulative     

Group: microsoft.public.security · Group Profile · Search for Ms04 in microsoft.public.security
Author: PSO
Date: Jul 17, 2007 02:24

With this months' monthly catalog release, we resolved the problem with MS04-025 incorrectly reporting that it was needed. Unfortunately, MBSA and SMS ITMU will now report that MS04-004 is needed. This is a recurrence of the same issue and will be fixed in a future update of the WSUSSCN2.CAB file for use with MBSA 2.0.1 and SMS ITMU. The older MS04-004 and MS04-025 security updates are
Show full article (0.26Kb)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 SUPPORT COMMUNICATION - SECURITY BULLETIN Document ID: c01634640 Version: 1 HPSBST02397 SSRT080187 rev.1 - Storage Management Appliance (SMA), Microsoft Patch Applicability MS08-078 NOTICE: The information in this Security Bulletin should be acted upon as soon as possible. Release Date: 2008-12-22 Last Updated: 2008-12-22 Potential     

Group: microsoft.public.security · Group Profile · Search for Ms04 in microsoft.public.security
Author: Canuck geoff
Date: Nov 29, 2006 05:51

Ondine <osprite99@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in news:f79ddb78-37c8-49a2-a43a-c73f5bdc7ecb@y38g2000hsy.googlegroups.co m: It's not luck at all. It's that I insist on clients using good quality equipment and maintaining it, as well as properly caring for their databases (with regularly backups and compacts), plus using best practices in development that minimize any possible risk of
Show full article (0.73Kb)
Hi David Thanks for your interest in this - here are some answers... > It's not luck at all. It's that I insist on clients using good > quality equipment and maintaining it, as well as properly caring for > their databases (with regularly backups and compacts), plus using > best practices in development that minimize any possible risk of > corruption. I have asked for a health-check on     

Group: microsoft.public.security.baseline_analyzer · Group Profile · Search for Ms04 in microsoft.public.security.baseline_analyzer
Author: Doug Neal [MSFT]
Date: Nov 16, 2006 14:47

Thanks that worked but the hotfix was to old. I applied some other updates that must have fixed the issue. I was able to identify the culprit thanks to your help. Great help!! -- Jim A. "Miles Li [MSFT]" wrote: Hello Jim, Thank you for posting here. According to your description, I understand that: After you re-install the WINS on the server, huge transaction
Show full article (1.85Kb)
Hello Jim, Thank you for posting here. According to your description, I understand that: After you re-install the WINS on the server, huge transaction logs is recorded in the location %%systemroot%%\System32\Wins folder. You need a practice to indentify which Windows XP SP2 client computers are causing the issue. If I have misunderstood the problem, please don't hesitate to let     

Group: microsoft.public.security.baseline_analyzer · Group Profile · Search for Ms04 in microsoft.public.security.baseline_analyzer
Author: Doug Neal [MSFT]
Date: Nov 16, 2006 14:41

Show full article (1.38Kb)
    

Group: mailing.unix.bugtraq · Group Profile · Search for Ms04 in mailing.unix.bugtraq
Author: security-alert
Date: Dec 24, 2008 12:55

Show full article (7.55Kb)
    

Group: microsoft.public.access.replication · Group Profile · Search for Ms04 in microsoft.public.access.replication
Author: David W. Fenton
Date: Sep 12, 2008 20:30

Show full article (5.68Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: microsoft.public.access.replication · Group Profile · Search for Ms04 in microsoft.public.access.replication
Author: Ondine
Date: Sep 12, 2008 13:45

Show full article (4.43Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs · Group Profile · Search for Ms04 in microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs
Author: JimA
Date: Aug 29, 2008 08:25

Show full article (3.23Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs · Group Profile · Search for Ms04 in microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs
Author: Miles Li [MSFT]
Date: Aug 29, 2008 04:06

Show full article (2.84Kb) · Show article thread
1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · next