Don Pearce wrote: On Wed, 07 Nov 2007 19:58:47 +0000, Rob <patchoulianremovethis@gmail.com> wrote: Don Pearce wrote: On Tue, 06 Nov 2007 08:46:47 +0000, Rob <patchoulianremovethis@gmail.com> wrote: Keith G wrote: "Rob" <patchoulianremovethis@gmail.com> wrote in message news:MJudnYkCFbDDA7LanZ2dnUVZ8s6inZ2d@bt.com... http://patchoulian.googlepages

On Tue, 06 Nov 2007 08:46:47 +0000, Rob <patchoulianremovethis@gmail.com> wrote: Keith G wrote: "Rob" <patchoulianremovethis@gmail.com> wrote in message news:MJudnYkCFbDDA7LanZ2dnUVZ8s6inZ2d@bt.com... http://patchoulian.googlepages.com/audiosamples Bottom of the page. Can anyone notice a difference between these two tracks? OK, as Don says - for comparisons

"Rob" <patchoulianremovethis@gmail.com> wrote in message news:MJudnYkCFbDDA7LanZ2dnUVZ8s6inZ2d@bt.com... http://patchoulian.googlepages.com/audiosamples Bottom of the page. Can anyone notice a difference between these two tracks? OK, as Don says - for comparisons these are far too long. (When I post whole tracks it's as much for entertainment value as anything else!) But I

In article <jNqdnblA7dOWkODbnZ2dnUVZ_sDinZ2d@comcast.com>, Ty Ford <tyreeford@comcast.net> wrote: There's a difference in how this was acheived, though. In older days it was through the arrangement of the music and studio recording practices. The Phil Spector 'wall of sound' for example. These days it's done using largely automatic processors after the studio recording

In article <jNqdnblA7dOWkODbnZ2dnUVZ_sDinZ2d@comcast.com>, Ty Ford <tyreeford@comcast.net> wrote: There's a difference in how this was acheived, though. In older days it was through the arrangement of the music and studio recording practices. The Phil Spector 'wall of sound' for example. These days it's done using largely automatic processors after the studio recording