In article <%%6VBk.82257$8G.53504@newsfe29.ams2>, Beav <beavis.original@ntlwoxorld.com> wrote: "S'mee" <stevenkeith2@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:a4d6e10d-7828-446b-ad48-41e8c879f98b@25g2000prz.googlegroups.com... On Sep 22, 2:06 pm, "Frisbee®" <discgolf...@gEEmail.com> wrote: Sean_Q_ wrote: Edward M. Kennedy wrote: I've heard that at this point, Harley's
"Sean_Q_" <nospam@no.sapm> wrote in message news:1QSBk.40461$PK.21560@newsfe04.iad... Edward M. Kennedy wrote: I've heard that at this point, Harley's are over-rated status symbols. This is true. For each measurable quality, a big V-twin Harley is surpassed by some other motorcycle(s). And yet they keep selling. The reason for this is enigmatic. It has often been attributed
On Sep 22, 2:06 pm, "Frisbee®" <discgolf...@gEEmail.com> wrote: Sean_Q_ wrote: Edward M. Kennedy wrote: I've heard that at this point, Harley's are over-rated status symbols. This is true. For each measurable quality, a big V-twin Harley is surpassed by some other motorcycle(s). And yet they keep selling. The reason for this is enigmatic. It has often been
Edward M. Kennedy wrote: I've heard that at this point, Harley's are over-rated status symbols. This is true. For each measurable quality, a big V-twin Harley is surpassed by some other motorcycle(s). And yet they keep selling. The reason for this is enigmatic. It has often been attributed to the MoCo's clever image-building (ie, marketing) but this is only partly correct. In fact Harley
"Twibil" <jose.noway6@gmail.com> wrote in message news:d81a934d-cb9d-466c-a854-9fea8c9baf96@w1g2000prk.googlegroups.com... On Sep 8, 2:02 pm, Grimly Curmudgeon <grimly4REM...@REMOVEgmail.com> wrote: I have a couple of hairs here - do you want to split them or just shove them up your arse? Ah, verily a soft answer turneth away wrath, so go fuck yourself with a chainsaw.
