Search result for Most Success Week Within http://www.nnseek.com/Most-Success-Week-Within_s.html Search results for Most Success Week Within Mon, 12 May 2008 22:31:19 PDT http://www.nnseek.com/ http://www.nnseek.com/ http://www.nnseek.com/img/64.png 64 64 NNSeek <![CDATA[Re: The 7 most successful bands of the 60s and 70s in terms of ALBUM chart success in US and UK]]> http://www.nnseek.com/e/rec.music.progressive/the_7_most_successful_bands_of_the_60s_and_70s_in_terms_180482048m.html http://www.nnseek.com/e/rec.music.progressive/the_7_most_successful_bands_of_the_60s_and_70s_in_terms_180482048m.html weeks they spent in the top 10. Dont care ...> Dont care And this is why your claims about measuring "success" are pure bunk. I am measuring success in terms of chart success, nothing else. You're not even measuring it by that much. You just found another ...

  Posted In: rec.music.progressive   no comments   Reply
]]> Mon, 12 May 2008 22:31:19 PDT <![CDATA[Re: The 7 most successful bands of the 60s and 70s in terms of ALBUM chart success in US and UK]]> http://www.nnseek.com/e/rec.music.progressive/the_7_most_successful_bands_of_the_60s_and_70s_in_terms_180481792m.html http://www.nnseek.com/e/rec.music.progressive/the_7_most_successful_bands_of_the_60s_and_70s_in_terms_180481792m.html weeks they spent in the top 10. Dont care ...> Dont care And this is why your claims about measuring "success" are pure bunk. I am measuring success in terms of chart success, nothing else. You're not even measuring it by that much. You just found another ...

  Posted In: rec.music.progressive   no comments   Reply
]]> Mon, 12 May 2008 22:31:02 PDT <![CDATA[Re: The 7 most successful bands of the 60s and 70s in terms of ALBUM chart success in US and UK]]> http://www.nnseek.com/e/rec.music.progressive/the_7_most_successful_bands_of_the_60s_and_70s_in_terms_180479744m.html http://www.nnseek.com/e/rec.music.progressive/the_7_most_successful_bands_of_the_60s_and_70s_in_terms_180479744m.html weeks they spent in the top 10. Dont care ...> Dont care And this is why your claims about measuring "success" are pure bunk. I am measuring success in terms of chart success, nothing else. You're not even measuring it by that much. You just found another stupid,...

  Posted In: rec.music.progressive   no comments   Reply
]]> Mon, 12 May 2008 22:10:39 PDT <![CDATA[Re: The 7 most successful bands of the 60s and 70s in terms of ALBUM chart success in US and UK]]> http://www.nnseek.com/e/rec.music.progressive/the_7_most_successful_bands_of_the_60s_and_70s_in_terms_180449024m.html http://www.nnseek.com/e/rec.music.progressive/the_7_most_successful_bands_of_the_60s_and_70s_in_terms_180449024m.html weeks they spent in the top 10. Dont care ...> Dont care And this is why your claims about measuring "success" are pure bunk. I am measuring success in terms of chart success, nothing else. You're not even measuring it by that much. You just found another stupid,...

  Posted In: rec.music.progressive   no comments   Reply
]]> Mon, 12 May 2008 14:47:34 PDT <![CDATA[Re: The 7 most successful bands of the 60s and 70s in terms of ALBUM chart success in US and UK]]> http://www.nnseek.com/e/rec.music.progressive/the_7_most_successful_bands_of_the_60s_and_70s_in_terms_180362496m.html http://www.nnseek.com/e/rec.music.progressive/the_7_most_successful_bands_of_the_60s_and_70s_in_terms_180362496m.html weeks they spent in the top 10. Dont care ... Dont care And this is why your claims about measuring "success" are pure bunk. I am measuring success in terms of chart success, nothing else. You're not even measuring it by that much. You just found another stupid, ...

  Posted In: rec.music.progressive   no comments   Reply
]]> Sun, 11 May 2008 20:00:33 PDT <![CDATA[Re: The 7 most successful bands of the 60s and 70s in terms of ALBUM chart success in US and UK]]> http://www.nnseek.com/e/rec.music.progressive/the_7_most_successful_bands_of_the_60s_and_70s_in_terms_180094208m.html http://www.nnseek.com/e/rec.music.progressive/the_7_most_successful_bands_of_the_60s_and_70s_in_terms_180094208m.html > Lip service. You're not worrying about how many weeks they spent in the top 10. Dont care ...>> Dont care And this is why your claims about measuring "success" are pure bunk. I am measuring success in terms of chart success, nothing else. You're not even measuring it by that much. You just found another stupid, ...

  Posted In: rec.music.progressive   no comments   Reply
]]> Fri, 09 May 2008 11:01:39 PDT <![CDATA[Re: The 7 most successful bands of the 60s and 70s in terms of ALBUM chart success in US and UK]]> http://www.nnseek.com/e/rec.music.progressive/the_7_most_successful_bands_of_the_60s_and_70s_in_terms_180006912m.html http://www.nnseek.com/e/rec.music.progressive/the_7_most_successful_bands_of_the_60s_and_70s_in_terms_180006912m.html thread title. What part of " in terms of ALBUM chart success in US and UK" you didnt get? Even if I accept ...7 were chosen. You're not worrying about how many weeks they spent in the top 10. Dont care ... Which ones are those? You are bullshitting as usual. Very few bands were successful in chart positions in both US and UK in the 60s and 70s. ...

  Posted In: rec.music.progressive   no comments   Reply
]]> Thu, 08 May 2008 20:44:47 PDT <![CDATA[Re: The 7 most successful bands of the 60s and 70s in terms of ALBUM chart success in US and UK]]> http://www.nnseek.com/e/rec.music.progressive/the_7_most_successful_bands_of_the_60s_and_70s_in_terms_180000000m.html http://www.nnseek.com/e/rec.music.progressive/the_7_most_successful_bands_of_the_60s_and_70s_in_terms_180000000m.html gmail.com> wrote: You're not worrying about how many weeks they spent in the top 10. Dont care ... Dont care And this is why your claims about measuring "success" are pure bunk. I am measuring success in terms of chart success, nothing else. You're not even measuring it by that much. You just found another stupid...

  Posted In: rec.music.progressive   no comments   Reply
]]> Thu, 08 May 2008 19:42:11 PDT <![CDATA[Re: The 7 most successful bands of the 60s and 70s in terms of ALBUM chart success in US and UK]]> http://www.nnseek.com/e/rec.music.progressive/the_7_most_successful_bands_of_the_60s_and_70s_in_terms_179995904m.html http://www.nnseek.com/e/rec.music.progressive/the_7_most_successful_bands_of_the_60s_and_70s_in_terms_179995904m.html weeks they spent in the top 10. Dont care ...> Dont care And this is why your claims about measuring "success" are pure bunk. I am measuring success in terms of chart success, nothing else. You're not even measuring it by that much. You just found another stupid, trivial, ...

  Posted In: rec.music.progressive   no comments   Reply
]]> Thu, 08 May 2008 19:26:38 PDT <![CDATA[Re: The 7 most successful bands of the 60s and 70s in terms of ALBUM chart success in US and UK]]> http://www.nnseek.com/e/rec.music.progressive/the_7_most_successful_bands_of_the_60s_and_70s_in_terms_179992832m.html http://www.nnseek.com/e/rec.music.progressive/the_7_most_successful_bands_of_the_60s_and_70s_in_terms_179992832m.html weeks they spent in the top 10. Dont care You're ...> ranked. Dont care And this is why your claims about measuring "success" are pure bunk. I am measuring success in terms of chart success, nothing else. I dont care about the sales list. It is bogus anyway. Like they went ...

  Posted In: rec.music.progressive   no comments   Reply
]]> Thu, 08 May 2008 19:12:18 PDT