... news:4ic6245v8d8k7ou7vv1nctdo5nmm2b30lm@4ax.com... http://www.newscientist.com/channel/opinion/mg19826551.700-do-we-need-to-change-the-definition-of-science.html Do we need to change the definition of science? 07 May 2008 From New Scientist Print Edition. Subscribe and get 4 free issues. Robert Matthews ...

... change, though. Popper's definition of science is being sorely tested ... failure". “The multiverse is no more pseudoscientific than the inside of ... being the distinguishing feature between science and pseudoscience. Yet even at ... practice, too vague to differentiate science from pseudoscience and bears little ...'mystical arrogance' to suggest that science is always playing catchup. This...

...Frederick <mmcne...@fuzzysys.com> wrote: http://www.newscientist.com/channel/opinion/mg19826551.700-do-we-need... Do we need to change the definition of science? 07 May 2008 From New Scientist Print Edition. Subscribe and get 4 free issues. Robert Matthews Nice post. It supports my opinion ...

... Times change, though. Popper's definition of science is being sorely tested by ... as pseudoscience, or should scientists be more relaxed about falsifiability? It's a ...to demonize them. Just put their "science" into another "category" say "muse ... "Rumours of the death of science have been greatly exaggerated." Robert Matthews is visiting reader in science at Aston University, Birmingham, UK ...

...Times change, though. Popper's definition of science is being sorely tested ... pseudoscience, or should scientists be more relaxed about falsifiability? It's ... being the distinguishing feature between science and pseudoscience. Yet even at ... practice, too vague to differentiate science from pseudoscience and bears little ... attention of many philosophers of science. "The most interesting views these ...

...how hard it would be to keep you amused in a million years time - when you seek far more of this kind of thing? And what of the millions of species who are already there?...an old guy's quantrains, ambiguous similarities with personal and world events and then plagiarise history and science to support their imaginings. If only they could make a prediction from their sources. All they offer...

...> which you speak - where even the words and numbers compute and make sense in a most extraordinary way. Imagine how hard it would be to keep you amused in a million years time - when you seek far more of this kind of thing? And what of the millions of species who are already there?  And many much further? How many know of us - and speak with us? As such advance intelligence ...

...people who you would rather were "less" than "more" of who they are? That is just an...A mechanism within the group consciousness.(Two or more) Long before humans were sentient or aware. ...life progresses and develops and evolves and changes - more come into sentience and awareness.  You can... progress further and have to devise more intelligence and more methods to what is basically ...

... whole arena of the philosphy of science is simply that of the ... 'mystical arrogance' to suggest that science is always playing catchup. This article...demonstration of yet another 'constant', the more they discover, the less they know...> Yes, I do appreciate the "science" that led to air travel, ...in the "without" existence - is far more clever scientifically than any mystical and...

...... The whole arena of the philosphy of science is simply that of the individual always growing ... states that it is 'mystical arrogance' to suggest that science is always playing catchup. This article is a great demonstration of yet another 'constant', the more they discover, the less they know'. Yes, I do appreciate the "science" that led to air travel, but the travel...