On Apr 23, 10:31 am, Ken <k...@invalid.com> wrote: Nick...@Click.com wrote: On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 11:55:11 -0700, "Henry Arnaud" <Henry.Arn...@phantom.com> wrote: Whatever the accepted legal definition was----Clinton was NOT asked that definition The "I did not have sexual relations with that woman" statement was made during a press conference
Ken wrote: Henry Arnaud wrote: Ken wrote: Nicklas@Click.com wrote: On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 11:55:11 -0700, "Henry Arnaud" <Henry.Arnaud@phantom.com> wrote: Whatever the accepted legal definition was----Clinton was NOT asked that definition The "I did not have sexual relations with that woman" statement was made during a press
On Apr 23, 5:06 pm, Nick...@Click.com wrote: On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 11:31:16 -0600, Ken <k...@invalid.com> wrote: No, I think you're trying to assign some "moral failing" to a public utterance that was truth. Click, you have gone to great length to convince yourself that as you call it, a blow job, is NOT "Sexual relations." Most people would disagree with you
Nicklas@Click.com wrote: On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 11:55:11 -0700, "Henry Arnaud" <Henry.Arnaud@phantom.com> wrote: Whatever the accepted legal definition was----Clinton was NOT asked that definition The "I did not have sexual relations with that woman" statement was made during a press conference. Christ, how can you people be so fucking dense?
This is 100%% relevant to Canadian politics because unoriginal, plagiaristic, stupid Dion is desparately trying to become Canada's Al Gore. Canada does not need or want Al Gore and hence, we do not need or want Dion. "An Inconvenient Truth" Is a Pack of Lies Posted on Monday, June 26, 2006 10:48:42 AM by Hillsdale Guy Before we get too hyped up about this move, understand that it's a piece
