On Dec 21, 7:06 am, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote: The Moon is not actually BLUE, except to the unfiltered eye. A good orange/amber worth of optical filter, as added onto an otherwise bandpass coated lens would have permitted a somewhat more natural color looking moon, as though viewed from Earth using a good telescope that's getting extensively filtered by our polluted atmosphere
On Dec 21, 7:06 am, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote: The Moon is not actually BLUE, except to the unfiltered eye. A good orange/amber worth of optical filter, as added onto an otherwise bandpass coated lens would have permitted a somewhat more natural color looking moon, as though viewed from Earth using a good telescope that's getting extensively filtered by our polluted atmosphere
On Dec 21, 7:06 am, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote: The Moon is not actually BLUE, except to the unfiltered eye. A good orange/amber worth of optical filter, as added onto an otherwise bandpass coated lens would have permitted a somewhat more natural color looking moon, as though viewed from Earth using a good telescope that's getting extensively filtered by our polluted atmosphere
The Moon is not actually BLUE, except to the unfiltered eye. A good orange/amber worth of optical filter, as added onto an otherwise bandpass coated lens would have permitted a somewhat more natural color looking moon, as though viewed from Earth using a good telescope that's getting extensively filtered by our polluted atmosphere and secondly by the rather extensive 8r worth of sodium atmosphere
Ask a really good question or much less suggest that we're not being told the whole truth and nothing but the truth, and all the sudden the lights of Usenet go out. - Brad Guth - BradGuth wrote: That moon of ours is not actually blue, except to the unfiltered camera eye. In addition to our physically dark, dusty and electrostatic charged moon that's more than gamma saturated, as
