Dzisiaj około 9.59 rozpocznie się emicja filmu o korporacji Monsanto, która od początku XX wieku zajmowała się produkją nawozów sztucznych i preparatów chemicznych dla rolnictwa a obecnie jest potentatem w produkcji żywności modyfikowanej genetycznie. Emisja dzisiaj ok. godz. 9.59, film z polskimi napisami - www.justin.tv/civiltv ...

... We're never going to agree on most of this stuff, so here are my thoughts: 1) Monsanto, and other companies, should not be given carte blanche as they have been in the policy of "... going to do safety studies on GM foods it should be done by independent scientists not by Monsanto (or such other companies) themselves. There is no reason to trust companies with an overriding profit motive...

... - if it's by gene splicing or by accidental or intentional introductions. There are too many variables, and we don't know as much as we need to about it. And if companies like Monsanto want to throw caution to the winds, who pays? And how does that weigh against the enormous benefits - benefits we are already seeing and potential benefits as the technology progresses (assuming ...

> > So why did Monsanto fudge its data,... It's another irrelevancy. The safety of GM food is a valid issue, but what some one company did with regard to one set of data (assuming they did what you said) is not. We are not discussing the practices of Monsanto - or its practices with regard to one study. If that was the sole topic of this thread you wouldn't be using it ...

... would be greatly speeded up if they moved even more boldly in the right direction. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120960668797158277.html?mod=loomia&loomia_si=t0:a16:g2:r2:c0.077777 Companies like Monsanto are the only ones who benefit from an exploding human population. Not so. We all benefit. Our own standard of living has grown right along with growing population. If the ...

...q.con> wrote: "Fred Weiss" <fredwe...@papertig.com> wrote in message So why did Monsanto fudge its data,... It's another irrelevancy. The safety of GM food is a valid issue, but ...(assuming they did what you said) is not. We are not discussing the practices of Monsanto - or its practices with regard to one study. Read the fucking subject line you fucking ...

......@q.con> wrote: "Fred Weiss" <fredwe...@papertig.com> wrote in message So why did Monsanto fudge its data,... It's another irrelevancy. The safety of GM food is a valid issue, but ...(assuming they did what you said) is not. We are not discussing the practices of Monsanto - or its practices with regard to one study. Read the fucking subject line you fucking idiot...

...No, stupid, it's you who is equivocating. Check for yourself, Monsanto aquired the co. that invented that gene in 2006, long ...the environment. Delta and Pine Land (later purchased by Monsanto) patented the terminator gene in 1998, in combination with the USDA. The basic technology was public domain. Monsanto immediately made plans to deploy the technology, but was stopped...

... to the simple question - or more likely don't *want to* answer it So why did Monsanto fudge its data,... It's another irrelevancy. The safety of GM food is a valid issue, but ... data (assuming they did what you said) is not. We are not discussing the practices of Monsanto - or its practices with regard to one study. Read the fucking subject line you fucking idiot. ...

...answer to the simple question - or more likely don't *want to* answer it So why did Monsanto fudge its data,... It's another irrelevancy. The safety of GM food is a valid issue, but ... of data (assuming they did what you said) is not. We are not discussing the practices of Monsanto - or its practices with regard to one study. Other than people's totally irrational and "primeval fears"...