...as changes in technology make new approaches economically feasible. Then, its not a new idea, No ideas ever are in that sense. Indeed there are. Like the miniaturisation of computers due to integrated circuits and single chip computers made the automation of many things feasible and allows a level of computer control that just wasnt practical to be...
... as changes in technology make new approaches economically feasible. Then, its not a new idea, No ideas ever are in that sense. Indeed there are. Like the miniaturisation of computers due to integrated circuits and single chip computers made the automation of many things feasible and allows a level of computer control that just wasnt practical to be ...
... like a random process either. It happens by observation and looking for an explanation for what is observed. which contradicts the premise of the claim being made. Nope. Like the miniaturisation of computers due to integrated circuits and single chip computers made the automation of many things feasible and allows a level of computer control that just wasnt practical to be ...
.... Refining existing ideas as changes in technology make new approaches economically feasible. Then, its not a new idea, which contradicts the premise of the claim being made. Like the miniaturisation of computers due to integrated circuits and single chip computers made the automation of many things feasible and allows a level of computer control that just wasnt practical to ...
... a "new idea" be generated, if not by a random process? By a non random process, stupid. Refining existing ideas as changes in technology make new approaches economically feasible. Like the miniaturisation of computers due to integrated circuits and single chip computers made the automation of many things feasible and allows a level of computer control that just wasnt practical to be so ...
... see it as a direction or force. I don't need any divine source for this direction. A Big Bang is ok for me. Things don't get smaller ( when I leave out the miniaturisation in technology ). There are, depending on the time scale, *constraints*, which may give the illusion of direction. But it isn't clear what Chaz is talking about; there's nothing that ...
... it as a direction or force. I don't need any divine source for this direction. A Big Bang is ok for me. Things don't get smaller ( when I leave out the miniaturisation in technology ). There are, depending on the time scale, *constraints*, which may give the illusion of direction. But it isn't clear what Chaz is talking about; there's nothing that mysterious about ...
... I see it as a direction or force. I don't need any divine source for this direction. A Big Bang is ok for me. Things don't get smaller ( when I leave out the miniaturisation in technology ). There are, depending on the time scale, *constraints*, which may give the illusion of direction. But it isn't clear what Chaz is talking about; there's nothing that mysterious about...
... I see it as a direction or force. I don't need any divine source for this direction. A Big Bang is ok for me. Things don't get smaller ( when I leave out the miniaturisation in technology ). There are, depending on the time scale, *constraints*, which may give the illusion of direction. But it isn't clear what Chaz is talking about; there's nothing that mysterious about...
.... But I see it as a direction or force. I don't need any divine source for this direction. A Big Bang is ok for me. Things don't get smaller ( when I leave out the miniaturisation in technology ). There are, depending on the time scale, *constraints*, which may give the illusion of direction. But it isn't clear what Chaz is talking about; there's nothing that mysterious about ...
