JAXA's Selene moon certainly looks a whole lot different than anything NASA/Apollo. Has the minerology of our moon actually changed that much? . - Brad Guth On Jan 9, 11:14 am, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote: For what reason(s) is the JAXA Selene mission so unusually taboo/ nondisclosure rated? Is the JAXA Selene mission broken, or just getting nailed by something unofficially
Nastepny kroczek w zrozumieniu biogenezy (???) Autor: maynard maynardd@gazeta.SKASUJ-TO.pl Data: 19-06-2007, 13:15:31 + pokaż cały nagłówek Astrochemicy z profesorem Uwe Meierhenrich z uniwersytetu w Nicei na czele, uwazaja ,ze aminokwasy niezbedne do powstania zycia przywedrowaly do nas z kosmosu. Uwazaja oni, ze promieniowanie gwiazd niszczylo formy prawoskretne, tak iz pozostawaly (przynajmniej
George wrote: "seanc" <discjonz@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1166292151.003408.35210@16g2000cwy.googlegroups.com... Jonathan wrote: More spheres, just like at the Opportunity site, and with single holes. I don't care what they say, simple mineral concretions formed in a wet substrate does NOT fully explain these things. Spherical concretions on earth are almost
"seanc" <discjonz@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1166292151.003408.35210@16g2000cwy.googlegroups.com... Jonathan wrote: More spheres, just like at the Opportunity site, and with single holes. I don't care what they say, simple mineral concretions formed in a wet substrate does NOT fully explain these things. Spherical concretions on earth are almost always formed from organic
Jonathan wrote: More spheres, just like at the Opportunity site, and with single holes. I don't care what they say, simple mineral concretions formed in a wet substrate does NOT fully explain these things. Spherical concretions on earth are almost always formed from organic material. Generally a result of microbial activity. And to have almost identical spherical concretions
