... music..what is interesting is that matt is saying much the same things I... bad more people won't call MattLombard on this kind of bullshit ... this behavior. In the SolidWorks Bible MattLombard tries to rewrite history on what happened with multi-bodies / disjoint bodies. MattLombard totally bought into SolidWorks line ... not be supported in part mode. Matt then turns around and tries to ...
On Sun, 9 Dec 2007 18:50:03 -0800 (PST), jon_banquer <jon_banquer@yahoo.com> wrote: It will be a cold day in hell before a SolidWorks user has the guts to agree with me and say the SolidWorks Bible could be made to be a lot better / more readable than it is. I'll make specifics available to any legit SolidWorks user that asks me where I think the SolidWorks Bible could be improved. ...
On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 23:08:58 -0800, gk <glkd@cox.net> wrote: Jon as HSMWorks team member "... Jon is not affiliated with HSMWorks ApS in any way and that we cannot control what people are writing on the web."
On Sun, 9 Dec 2007 22:48:01 -0800 (PST), jon_banquer <jon_banquer@yahoo.com> wrote: Ignorant: Not being able to count to 11 even after all the free clues? Oops .. forgot ... you never got that far in Jr. High shop math.
On Sun, 9 Dec 2007 13:15:28 -0800 (PST), TOP <kellnerp@cbd.net> wrote: Ben, Java could very well be the issue. I have had issues with 3rd party addins lately because MSoft lost a lawsuit with Sun over Java and pulled msjava.dll from circulation. Until MSoft and their minions clean out code that may reference this dll I wouldn't be surprised if more problems related to java arise...
On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 08:33:21 -0800, brewertr@aol.com wrote: On Sun, 9 Dec 2007 07:53:40 -0800 (PST), jon_banquer <jon_banquer@yahoo.com> wrote: I'm working with HSMWorks to change this. Jon as HSMWorks team member: "... Jon is not affiliated with HSMWorks ApS in any way and that we cannot control what people are writing on the web."
On Sun, 9 Dec 2007 07:53:40 -0800 (PST), jon_banquer <jon_banquer@yahoo.com> wrote: Of bigger concern to me is that the CAM choices running inside of SolidWorks are still no where near good enough. I'm working with HSMWorks to change this. ".. Jon is not affiliated with HSMWorks ApS in any way and that we cannot control what people are writing on the web." "Anybody can get ...
On Sun, 9 Dec 2007 07:53:40 -0800 (PST), jon_banquer <jon_banquer@yahoo.com> wrote: If Solidworks 2009 is good why not? Jr. HS English drop-out or failure. BTW, It's now 2007. Math impaired as well .... never even took shop math or simple trig, eh? "... Jon is not affiliated with HSMWorks ApS in any way and that we cannot control what people are writing on the web."
On Sat, 8 Dec 2007 22:06:25 -0800 (PST), jon_banquer <jon_banquer@yahoo.com> wrote: The cadcam industry is filled with software companies who actually really hate their users. We need more intelligent users who have the guts to stand up and tell software companies to go fuck themselves when they pull their bullshit. And the utterly clueless do this how & why, exactly? With ...
On Sat, 8 Dec 2007 22:06:25 -0800 (PST), jon_banquer <jon_banquer@yahoo.com> wrote: The cadcam industry is filled with software companies who actually really hate their users. We need more intelligent users What's with this royal "We" stuff, clueless? You are neiter an actual user nor "intelligent", much less more. Nor do ANY of the firms or developers or programmers or even ...
