the artist <SOC.MOTSSspamt...@panix.com> wrote: http://www.laweekly.com/news/news/obamas-gay-gold-mine/18247/?page=1 The story is hideously biased. It's a crime that a newspaper can run a political ad for free, and label it as "news." "So with Hillary Clinton's powerful political machine pounding away at the Obama campaign..." "They [the Obama supporters] are the new guard,
On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 17:47:53 GMT, Justine <wherethereistruth@freedom.net> wrote: On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 07:31:24 -0700, noname <noname@nowhere.com> wrote: On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 10:51:32 GMT, Justine <wherethereistruth@freedom.net> wrote: On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 12:37:00 -0400, Oldie69@webtv.net (Olly Mensch) wrote: N oName - you are not correct in assuming that simply because
On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 10:51:32 GMT, Justine <wherethereistruth@freedom.net> wrote: On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 12:37:00 -0400, Oldie69@webtv.net (Olly Mensch) wrote: N oName - you are not correct in assuming that simply because no one has apparently mentioned any of the Republican candidates - so far - that it means that none are acceptable. I am only too happy to offer my reaction to
"JHM" <jhmccloskey@post.harvard.edu> wrote in message news:1160532583.794229.85220@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com... The proposal sounds nifty, but we've already had one pro-science President, the Hon. John Quincy Adams of Massacusetts, who seems mostly to have managed to retard the advance of science in the USA by being militantly pro it. Sad to say, it was America's Party, the
"JHM" <jhmccloskey@post.harvard.edu> wrote in message news:1160532583.794229.85220@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com... The proposal sounds nifty, but we've already had one pro-science President, the Hon. John Quincy Adams of Massacusetts, who seems mostly to have managed to retard the advance of science in the USA by being militantly pro it. Sad to say, it was America's Party, the
