Michael Schey wrote: Nothing wrong with the list. It's the source of the list that I question. Why ? Because you question their political and news coverage, their entertainment writers are questionable too ? How about their sports writers, are they questionable ? On 20 Dec 2006 10:07:59 -0800, Patrick1765@aol.com wrote:
Consider the source (not Patrick in this case, but the source of the list). The NY Post? Give me a break. Robin Williams once mentioned the NYP in one of his skits, saying he used the paper on the bottom of a bird-cage and the parrot kept on saying "Redundant, redundant". On 20 Dec 2006 10:07:59 -0800, Patrick1765@aol.com wrote: nypost.com December 19, 2006 -- Pick your favorite
David Bradshaw: The best of companions: J.W.N. Sullivan, Aldous Huxley, and the new physics. The Review of English Studies, May 1996 v47 n186 p188(19) [Sullivan's Beethoven: His Spiritual Development, discussed below, is my very favorite book on music.] Abstract: John William Navin Sullivan was an early-1900s science writer who was abhorred by a few people as he was loved and admired by
On Jun 1, 10:16 pm, bookb...@yahoo.com wrote: On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 20:11:12 -0700 (PDT), Dennis <nldo...@shaw.ca> wrote: On Jun 1, 9:46 am, Dennis <nldo...@shaw.ca> wrote: Beyond Psychology: The Moral Basis of Jonson's Theory of Humour Characterization James D. Redwine, Jr. …Crites characterization of humourous men: “their WILLS consume/Such powers of
ABEND/TOAST/STORY? - Sleeping with the Enemy This turned out longer than I meant it to be. The content is suggestive, but not explicit. It's probably sexist too, but the fantasy elements are clearly marked. ================================================================ The cyclist in worn, black protective gear slouched at an out-of-the-way table, alone, quietly examining a
