... flawed. How exactly is it incorrect? OBE is not for you or Susan, Tom. People like you will continually be blinded by your assumptions and uniform experimentation. People like Luddy who experiment differently every time as a result of their extensive reading -- well, those people will be rewarded with results. I've experimented with many techniques and used those ...

... is incorrect. She assumes that she is practicing OBE correctly. Therefore, her research results are flawed. OBE is not for you or Susan, Tom. People like you will continually be blinded by your assumptions and uniform experimentation. People like Luddy who experiment differently every time as a result of their extensive reading -- well, those people will be rewarded with results.

R H Draney wrote: Greg Procter filted: An insult is an insult whether or not it hits it's target. "Don't be a luddy-duddy! Don't be a mooncalf! Don't be a jabbernowl! You're not those, are you?"...r Egbert Sousé, IINM. -- Frank ess

R H Draney wrote: Greg Procter filted: An insult is an insult whether or not it hits it's target. "Don't be a luddy-duddy! Don't be a mooncalf! Don't be a jabbernowl! You're not those, are you?"...r Good illustration!

Greg Procter filted: An insult is an insult whether or not it hits it's target. "Don't be a luddy-duddy! Don't be a mooncalf! Don't be a jabbernowl! You're not those, are you?"...r -- "You got Schadenfreude on my Weltanschauung!" "You got Weltanschauung in my Schadenfreude!"

...Prinn" <masterprinn@aol.com> wrote in message news:1159252367.870651.14570@d34g2000cwd.googlegroups.com... Tom wrote: What's the point of all this adolescent crap, Luddie? I permitted *you* to set the tone for this conversation. You presented your Mighty Magickal Finglongering, and I debunked it and neatly returned to the depths of your ass from whence ...

"Ludwig Prinn" <masterprinn@aol.com> wrote in message news:1159252367.870651.14570@d34g2000cwd.googlegroups.com... Tom wrote: What's the point of all this adolescent crap, Luddie? I permitted *you* to set the tone for this conversation. You presented your Mighty Magickal Finglongering, and I debunked it and neatly returned to the depths of your ass from whence it ...

... are just slow learners. So you're saying that editing someone's post is an "old ploy" that "never works", What's the point of all this adolescent crap, Luddie? I permitted *you* to set the tone for this conversation. You presented your Mighty Magickal Finglongering, and I debunked it and neatly returned to the depths of your ass from whence it sprung. Then you got all ...

...from what you say. You're clearly confused about it. You're still a total fucking wanker. TRANSLATION: Still beating that dead horse. Some people are just slow learners. So you're saying that editing someone's post is an "old ploy" that "never works", What's the point of all this adolescent crap, Luddie? What do you think it's accomplishing?