"Talia Felix" <talia.felix@gmail.com> wrote in message news:8d343c38-464a-4d9a-a78a-c721649e14de@a3g2000prm.googlegroups.com... Umm, that actually is traditional. I've been buying painted lodestones for years. Hilarious. How much do you pay for them?

...that for attracting money usually only one lodestone is used. yes, that's my ...I read that one should use two lodestones in this case [two] (for example in... I don't know why a lodestone would take something away, as their ... it would help to paint the lodestones different colors.... that's not an ..., that actually is traditional. I've been buying painted lodestones for years.

... more to reality than the limits of what our new technology can, or is able to tell us? No. We do not have enough information to completely deny that possibility. It's not a question of denying such a possibility. Of course the possibility exists that there are things we don't know yet - it's a 100%% probability, in fact. The problem is that ...

... is more to reality than the limits of what our new technology can, or is able to tell us? No. We do not have enough information to completely deny that possibility. It's not a question of denying such a possibility. Of course the possibility exists that there are things we don't know yet - it's a 100%% probability, in fact. The problem is that you are ...

... is more to reality than the limits of what our new technology can, or is able to tell us? No. We do not have enough information to completely deny that possibility. It's not a question of denying such a possibility. Of course the possibility exists that there are things we don't know yet - it's a 100%% probability, in fact. The problem is that you are ...

... is more to reality than the limits of what our new technology can, or is able to tell us? No. We do not have enough information to completely deny that possibility. It's not a question of denying such a possibility. Of course the possibility exists that there are things we don't know yet - it's a 100%% probability, in fact. The problem is that you are arbitrarily ...

... there is more to reality than the limits of what our new technology can, or is able to tell us? No. We do not have enough information to completely deny that possibility. It's not a question of denying such a possibility. Of course the possibility exists that there are things we don't know yet - it's a 100%% probability, in fact. The problem is that you are ...

... there is more to reality than the limits of what our new technology can, or is able to tell us? No. We do not have enough information to completely deny that possibility. It's not a question of denying such a possibility. Of course the possibility exists that there are things we don't know yet - it's a 100%% probability, in fact. The problem is that you are arbitrarily...

...there is more to reality than the limits of what our new technology can, or is able to tell us? No. We do not have enough information to completely deny that possibility. It's not a question of denying such a possibility. Of course the possibility exists that there are things we don't know yet - it's a 100%% probability, in fact. The problem is that you are arbitrarily picking one of...

...know", because the truth is we know a lot more about this question than you think. While it's true that we do not know ...to tell us about "why we are here" or any other such questions that people think would be useful to put to a creator because ... idea of yours. Agnosticism is not a rational response to the question of the existence of an intelligent and interventionary creator. Not only is...