"Jeff Findley" <jeff.findley@ugs.nojunk.com> wrote: If you have read the entire Roger's Commission Report on the Challenger disaster, then you came away with far different conclusions than I. I have, but then I have also studied the other accounts and pondered upon them and thus reached my conclusions based on facts rather than seeking the bits the reinforce my biases. For different reasons
"Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)" <mooregr_deleteth1s@greenms.com> wrote: This is very back of the envelope. It's a half generation at best - as the question of what to launch Orion on when the Shuttle does retire isn't really addressed, just deferred. From a programmatic point of view, if you want a new booster in 2015 you need to be getting a good start on it right about now. I'm
"Jeff" <yourimageunreels@sbcglobal.net> wrote TAR <tom.r...@ix.netcom.com> wrote: Most of the time, it's not necessary for posters to read all previous text in a thread. Keeping it in your reply only makes them scroll unnecesarily. Well, I post through Google, and I never have to scroll to read the long replies. I don't understand why others have to scroll. Because not
"Jeff" <yourimageunreels@sbcglobal.net> wrote Who says that what anybody says is useful? Well, at least one person must have said something useful at some point, if only because they said, 'Nothing else that anyone has ever said was useful.' Either it's true, in which case it is useful to know that, or it's false, in which case someone *else* must have said something useful. (Or, perhaps
<david.black2@yahoo.com> wrote Thank you, Lizz "needs to get some new schtick after ten years" Holmans. Oh no he di-n't. I totally believe that Lizz can and will kick your scrawny ass any time. -- --Sean http://spclsd223.livejournal.com Wilson: Are you sure you're right? House: Absolutely. Your socks don't match, which means you got dressed in the dark, which means you don't
