[NOTE: This NANAS post was generated and posted by a script, not a human. In cases of email sightings, the recipient address and mailhost are probably munged. If you require information about this post, please email darkshad -at- darkshado.ca] LARTs to: abuse {at} loxinfo'co'th, abuse {at} ais'co'th, postmaster {at} ais'co'th, root {at} ais'co'th, webmaster {at} ais'co'th, hostmaster {at} ais'co'th

6502 wrote: E' volevo trovare qualche donzella inglese o qualche italiano parabolato, con cui parlare della tv satellitare free 2 air, per verificare quale era il mio livello di comprendonio!. Qua i più si guardano film e telefilm. Il ricevitore dei canali liberi ce l'ho, ma non mi ha dato mai l'impressione di offrire granche' di interessante, per cui l'ho addirittura staccato dalla

David Schultz wrote: If gcc actually implemented IEEE 754R / C99 / LIA1 correctly, then when compiling something like 'double x = y' would require it to store the value to memory and then reload it to force it to 53-bit precision. Even this wouldn't work, since it would result in double rounding. The whole point of double_t is to allow the programmer to ask for a variable that

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Post-Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 07:21:00 +0000 Info: Copy of spam reported via SpamCop.Net Info: Country info based on IP::Country Info: ASN info based on asn.routeviews.org SPAMCOP.net-REPORT: http://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z1356286488z6cbdac7ae2bc62e9099f6a998c3a1d35z Spam-Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 22:49:33 +0000 (1184224860) Spam-Track: IP=72.252.71