Learnability
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
 Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...
found 193 articles for 0.305 sec
-----Original Message----- >From: "Mark T.B. Carroll" <mark@ixod.org> >Sent: Apr 11, 2007 10:18 AM >To: kynn <kynnjo@gmail.com> >Cc: haskell-cafe@haskell.org >Subject: Re: [Haskell-cafe] Why Perl is more learnable than Haskell > >Sorry to hear of your struggles. There has been a lot of work lately on >writing Haskell tutorials but there's still a long way to go, >unfortunately, as I discovered     

Group: fa.haskell · Group Profile · Search for Learnability in fa.haskell
Author: Dave Feustel
Date: Apr 11, 2007 08:02

I am also coming at haskell from a perl background. While there is some truth to what you say, I do think haskell can be used for "keeping simple things simple" in a way similar to perl. Though you have to search harder since the documentation / tutorials seem to be more optimized for "making hard things possible". (And in fact, much easier than in perl.) But back to the easy, here is a thread
Show full article (1.08Kb)
My opinion is that "learnin haskell is difficult" is just for the fact that when you learn programming, you probably begin with C / C++ or some other procedural/OO programming language, so you get used to think in these ways, and when you have to switch to functional paradigm, you find it difficoult. If you first language is LISP probably you find easy Haskell and difficult pearl. 2007/4/11     

Group: fa.haskell · Group Profile · Search for Learnability in fa.haskell
Author: Thomas Hartman
Date: Apr 11, 2007 07:35

Perl is a large, ugly, messy language filled with quirks and eccentricities, while Haskell is an extremely elegant language whose design is guided by a few overriding ideas. (Or so I'm told.) Based on this one would think that it would be much easier to learn Haskell than to learn Perl, but my experience is exactly the opposite. I've been wanting to learn Haskell for years, literally, but
Show full article (3.45Kb) · Show article thread
Hi Norman, welcome to the forums, and to unicycling. 24" or 26" to learn should not make very much of a difference. Get long cranks for your 26", like 140 or 150 mm. Later you want to swap them for shorter cranks, 100 to 125 mm, because that would allow you to ride faster and more relaxed. Feet on pedals, most people (recommend to) put the balls of their feet on the pedal. How do you know     

Group: fa.haskell · Group Profile · Search for Learnability in fa.haskell
Author: riccardo cagnasso
Date: Apr 11, 2007 06:18

In <o153d4ltju29dagkr3dpn2l41f492nsns6@yarwho.com>, Snapper wrote: Matt McLeod wrote... The TAPs make all the difference. Without them, the Topfields are fairly mediocre at best with a lousy user interface. Looking at the manual, the Toppy's interface seems to be a lot better than the Supernet PVR that I'm currently using. And it's learnable, but could be easier. As for
Show full article (3.23Kb) · Show article thread
Snapper wrote: > Matt McLeod wrote... > >> The TAPs make all the difference. Without them, the Topfields are fairly >> mediocre at best with a lousy user interface. > > Looking at the manual, the Toppy's interface seems to be a lot better than the > Supernet PVR that I'm currently using. And it's learnable, but could be easier. > > As for the TAPs I assume that they require a serial port     

Group: fa.haskell · Group Profile · Search for Learnability in fa.haskell
Author: kynn
Date: Apr 11, 2007 05:55

Matt McLeod wrote... The TAPs make all the difference. Without them, the Topfields are fairly mediocre at best with a lousy user interface. Looking at the manual, the Toppy's interface seems to be a lot better than the Supernet PVR that I'm currently using. And it's learnable, but could be easier. As for the TAPs I assume that they require a serial port connection? If so then I'm stuffed
Show full article (2.41Kb)
On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 12:24:29 +0000, Dragomir Kollaric wrote: > On 2008-08-30, noshellswill hit the keyboard and wrote: >>> > My reply to a previous post: > >>> With a bit of *reading* on how one can do that, there is >>> no problem. some MS-folks seems to have a problem with >>> the advice to lump the experience they gained using MS, >>> and learn. For Gawhd's sake     

Group: rec.sport.unicycling · Group Profile · Search for Learnability in rec.sport.unicycling
Author: Klaas Bil
Date: Sep 21, 2008 14:55

On 2008-08-30, noshellswill hit the keyboard and wrote: My reply to a previous post: With a bit of *reading* on how one can do that, there is no problem. some MS-folks seems to have a problem with the advice to lump the experience they gained using MS, and learn. For Gawhd's sake I had to learn to use MS applications at my work-place too, and I
Show full article (1.28Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: aus.tv.digital · Group Profile · Search for Learnability in aus.tv.digital
Author: Matt McLeod
Date: Sep 17, 2008 19:50

Show full article (0.92Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: aus.tv.digital · Group Profile · Search for Learnability in aus.tv.digital
Author: annily
Date: Sep 17, 2008 18:31

Show full article (0.68Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: aus.tv.digital · Group Profile · Search for Learnability in aus.tv.digital
Author: Snapper
Date: Sep 17, 2008 16:37

Show full article (0.70Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.os.linux.ubuntu · Group Profile · Search for Learnability in alt.os.linux.ubuntu
Author: noshellswill
Date: Aug 30, 2008 06:14

Show full article (2.42Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.os.linux.ubuntu · Group Profile · Search for Learnability in alt.os.linux.ubuntu
Author: Dragomir Kollaric
Date: Aug 30, 2008 05:24

Show full article (1.59Kb) · Show article thread
1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · next