On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 09:57:27 +0200, Jeff <where@home.nl> wrote: In article <0qvca4ts1kb4de1f9d9iqqm5qrj1kft8ms@4ax.com>, boberglund@home.se says... On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 20:55:01 -0700, Goosbee <Goosbee@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote: "Barnsie" wrote: Hello all! As background: I have a 64 bit Vista Ultimate rig running Virtual PC 2007 (SP1
On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 20:55:01 -0700, Goosbee <Goosbee@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote: "Barnsie" wrote: Hello all! As background: I have a 64 bit Vista Ultimate rig running Virtual PC 2007 (SP1), with a Vista 32 bit VPC set with Shared Networking (NAT) and with Undo disk turned on (i.e. you can dispose of changes after each session). The host machine runs Windows
Can anyone explain the adherence to ECMA? Instead of var a:int = 5 var obj:Object = new Object(); Why not this? int a = 5; Object obj; Or even... Object* obj = new Object(); No private constructors... Limited preprocessor directives... No operator overloading... No multiple inheritance... No pointers... Whats up with that? Well I guess I could understand
I installed Google Analytics on my web pages these past few days. I like it a lot, mostly because it is free and provides better information than the free statistics from my web hosting company. I few complaints, like they should give be hour-by-hour details. And obviously, Google is has this service in the first place so they can spy on me. I understand those parts. But, "waddya want
