Xah wrote: is there a way to setup emacs so that keybindings defined in the global keymap always override specific bindings in major or minor modes? I mean, so that i don't have to define hooks for every mode i might use. See (info "(elisp) Searching Keymaps")

is there a way to setup emacs so that keybindings defined in the global keymap always override specific bindings in major or minor modes? I mean, so that i don't have to define hooks for every mode i might use. Xah ∑ http://xahlee.org/ ☄

...with the Control? In summary, the notation for a Meta/Control+Shift+‹letter› keybinding used in macro is not consistant. For Meta, "-N" is effective but...might have miscommunicated. I try again: I want to define a keybinding with the Shift down. e.g. Ctrl+Shift+n. In emacs... This seems to be a bug. i'm trying to set keybindings for both Ctrl+n and Ctrl+Shift+n, by: (global-set...

... both M-n and M-N. I might have miscommunicated. I try again: I want to define a keybinding with the Shift down. e.g. Ctrl+Shift+n. In emacs, it appears there are 2 notations that can be ....org/ ☄ --------------------- This seems to be a bug. i'm trying to set keybindings for both Ctrl+n and Ctrl+Shift+n, by: (global-set-key (kbd "C-N") 'f1) (...

... for both M-n and M-N. I might have miscommunicated. I try again: I want to define a keybinding with the Shift down. e.g. Ctrl+Shift+n. In emacs, it appears there are 2 notations that can...property. Xah ∑ http://xahlee.org/ ☄ --------------------- This seems to be a bug. i'm trying to set keybindings for both Ctrl+n and Ctrl+Shift+n, by: (global-set-key (kbd "C-N") 'f1) ...

This seems to be a bug. i'm trying to set keybindings for both Ctrl+n and Ctrl+Shift+n, by: (global-set-key (kbd "C-N") 'f1) (global-set-key (kbd "C-n") 'f2) however, that doesn't work. Emacs will take both Ctrl+Shift+n and Ctrl+Shift+n to be whichever is evaluated last. In this case, f2. But the following works: (global-set-key (kbd "C-S-n") 'f1) (global-set-key (kbd "C-n") 'f2...

> The erognomic keybinding has a new version. http://xahlee.org/emacs/ergonomic_emacs_keybinding.html Much improved new version 3.4. Fixed compatility with cua mode, isearch, minibuffer, shell/comint mode, info mode, and other modes: awk, rcirc, w3m, nxml. Compatible with other major programing modes: c-mode, c++-mode, java, sh, js, perl, php, python. Also added just-one-space, ...

> The erognomic keybinding has a new version. http://xahlee.org/emacs/ergonomic_emacs_keybinding.html Much improved new version 3.4. Fixed compatility with cua mode, isearch, minibuffer, shell/comint mode, info mode, and other modes: awk, rcirc, w3m, nxml. Compatible with other major programing modes: c-mode, c++-mode, java, sh, js, perl, php, python. Also added just-one-space, ...

... On Sep 2, 5:21 pm, Will Parsons <oud...@nodomain.invalid> wrote: Xahwrote: The erognomic keybinding has a new version. http://xahlee.org/emacs/ergonomic_emacs_keybinding.html A visual image ...But i wanted to hold out a bit. there are many issues in designing a ergonomic keybinding set. Basically, you just have so many physical keys and in a fixed keyboard layout, and...

Xah wrote: The erognomic keybinding has a new version. http://xahlee.org/emacs/ergonomic_emacs_keybinding.html A visual image for old and new layout can be seen at: http://xahlee.org/emacs/ergonomic_emacs_keybinding_change.html Description of the main changes: ? Added delete-backward-char, delete-char, delete-backward-word, delete-word commands. ? The undo, cut,...