In rec.arts.books, ibshambat2004@hotmail.com had the audacity to say that: Scott Peck was to psychology what Immanuel Kant was to Western philosophy. I'm sorry did you just compare Immanuel Kant and M. Scott Peck? Wasn't MSP that new age hack who sold a quadrillion books? *R* *H* -- "...

...-b573-44f8-9170-de843896f9b8@h1g2000prh.googlegroups.com... “Space-time are mind’s categories”, said Kant and Romano Amodeo proves it While a Philosopher reasons using personal ideas, a Science ... ------------------------- How does any of what you say here have anything to do with Kant's formulation of the transcendental unity of apperception? I have told it in the first rows...

....amo...@libero.it> wrote: “Space-time are mind’s categories”, said Kant and Romano Amodeo proves it While a Philosopher reasons using personal ideas, a Science ... year of the Earth is an EXPONENTIAL DEFORMATION. Therefore, this assumption, of Emanuel Kant, is perfectly proved! Romano Amodeo- Tekst uit oorspronkelijk bericht niet weergeven - - Tekst uit...

....com... “Space-time are mind’s categories”, said Kant and Romano Amodeo proves it While a Philosopher reasons using ... is an EXPONENTIAL DEFORMATION. Therefore, this assumption, of Emanuel Kant, is perfectly proved! Romano Amodeo ------------------------- How does any of what you say here have anything to do with Kant's formulation of the transcendental unity of apperception?

“Space-time are mind’s categories”, said Kant and Romano Amodeo proves it While a Philosopher reasons using personal ideas, a Science Philosopher reasons about scientific knowledge. So I’ll prove this... seconds are exactly 9 prime minutes. So also the sidereal year of the Earth is an EXPONENTIAL DEFORMATION. Therefore, this assumption, of Emanuel Kant, is perfectly proved! Romano Amodeo

... not precisely a criticism, but a critical analysis; Kant is not attacking "pure reason," except, ... That's a terrible interpretation of Kant. Now I can see where Rand got ...> some of her "distorting" ideas about Kant, from popular scribblings such as Durant's. ...the exposing of genuinely higher truth such as Kants, even if one doesnt understand the content. ...

... not precisely a criticism, but a critical analysis; Kant is not attacking "pure reason," except, ... That's a terrible interpretation of Kant. Now I can see where Rand got ... some of her "distorting" ideas about Kant, from popular scribblings such as Durant's. ... the exposing of genuinely higher truth such as Kants, even if one doesnt understand the content. ...

... is not precisely a criticism, but a critical analysis; Kant is not attacking "pure reason," except, ...> That's a terrible interpretation of Kant. Now I can see where Rand got some of her "distorting" ideas about Kant, from popular scribblings such as Durant's. ... the exposing of genuinely higher truth such as Kants, even if one doesnt understand the content. ...

... is not precisely a criticism, but a critical analysis; Kant is not attacking "pure reason," except, ... That's a terrible interpretation of Kant. Now I can see where Rand got some of her "distorting" ideas about Kant, from popular scribblings such as Durant's. ... the exposing of genuinely higher truth such as Kants, even if one doesnt understand the content. It...

... Me <jpd...@gmail.com> And the tragedy is, so long as the true import of Kant's work in Categorical Logic, being decidedly an extension and refinement of the *Organon* of ... to elude the efforts of software engineers, who given the impetus to access this which is in Kant's terms, "metaphysical science"--why! Wouldn't they be today far advanced along the way toward ...