...fundamental problem with this direct realist reading of Kant is that it does... of representations. As mentioned above, Kant persistently talks of representations as being... represent that goes contrary to direct realism, as along as the ... the difference. But for Immanuel Kant, the Critical stance is to ... rather than ontological nature of Kant's Critique, see Henry Allison's...

...fundamental problem with this direct realist reading of Kant is that it does... of representations. As mentioned above, Kant persistently talks of representations as being... represent that goes contrary to direct realism, as along as the ... the difference. But for Immanuel Kant, the Critical stance is to ... rather than ontological nature of Kant's Critique, see Henry Allison's...

...PA9&lpg=PA9&dq=kant+direct+realist&source=web&ots=NtFRSxHVIo...was as direct realist, that is, that we are aware of...of representations. As mentioned above, Kant persistently talks of representations as...represent that goes contrary to direct realism, as along as the...the difference. But for Immanuel Kant, the Critical stance is to...rather than ontological nature of Kant's Critique, see Henry Allison...

... same moment is, if you become a brain dead sad and pathetic indoctrinated Kantian and use 100%% pure imagination. But of course reality is not imagined, its not mind dependent, therefore Kant's idea is unreal, therefore is untrue, therefore IS a blatant contradiction of reality, NOT according to language but according to reality which is NOT dependent upon language. Ideas ...

... a subject originating as or from a subject, they go on and on and on and on forever, have you ever read Kant? The question is, have YOU ever read Kant? A subject unable to be directly linked or unable to be reduced right back down to an irreducible and sensory level of perception can ONLY be a ...

... same moment is, if you become a brain dead sad and pathetic indoctrinated Kantian and use 100%% pure imagination. But of course reality is not imagined, its not mind dependent, therefore Kant's idea is unreal, therefore is untrue, therefore IS a blatant contradiction of reality, NOT according to language but according to reality which is NOT dependent upon language. Ideas claimed to be ...

...cant be said about a subject originating as or from a subject, they go on and on and on and on forever, have you ever read Kant? A subject unable to be directly linked or unable to be reduced right back down to an irreducible and sensory level of perception can ONLY be a subject about a subject. ...

... idea HAS to be about or be able to be directly linked to sensory evidence / matter. Matter doesn't contradict itself, ... was no space before god created it, because space, contrary to Kant, is NOT nothing, it exists in SENSORY REALITY, then if ... still cannot reach outside the boundries of experience of it, as Kant might say. Grammatically, or more formally in grammatical predicate logic, ...

.... e.g. ask yourself, does the idea correspond to something in sensory reality, does it contain any known and or blatant contadictions OR is it totally 100%% mind dependent, e.g. Kants idea that space and tree exist where each other exists at the same moment, therefore complete total utter crap. Non sequitur. That was not a valid argument, only empty blathering. Michael ...

..., it leaves the mind of reason, no choice but then to identify those ideas. e.g. ask yourself, does the idea correspond to something in sensory reality, does it contain any known and or blatant contadictions OR is it totally 100%% mind dependent, e.g. Kants idea that space and tree exist where each other exists at the same moment, therefore complete total utter crap. Michael Gordge