Floyd L. Davidson wrote: Jerry Avins <jya@ieee.org> wrote: (snip on analog vs. digital signals) There are only two possible values for the output of a hard limiter. There are an infinite number of errors in your statement. An FM signal, such as you specified earlier, does not encode information as voltage levels. The phase or frequency contains the information, and a
On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 20:52:29 -0800, floyd@apaflo.com (Floyd L. Davidson) wrote: Jerry Avins <jya@ieee.org> wrote: Floyd L. Davidson wrote: Jerry Avins <jya@ieee.org> wrote: Floyd maintains that any signal whose values are restricted to a finite set -- IOW, "quantized" -- is digital. I cited a two-level analog signal and I can demonstrate a digital signal with a
On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 20:52:29 -0800, floyd@apaflo.com (Floyd L. Davidson) wrote: Jerry Avins <jya@ieee.org> wrote: Floyd L. Davidson wrote: Jerry Avins <jya@ieee.org> wrote: Floyd maintains that any signal whose values are restricted to a finite set -- IOW, "quantized" -- is digital. I cited a two-level analog signal and I can demonstrate a digital signal with a
Jerry Avins <jya@ieee.org> wrote: Floyd L. Davidson wrote: Jerry Avins <jya@ieee.org> wrote: Floyd maintains that any signal whose values are restricted to a finite set -- IOW, "quantized" -- is digital. I cited a two-level analog signal and I can demonstrate a digital signal with a relatively large continuous range of values. His definitions are simply too restrictive
Floyd L. Davidson wrote: Jerry Avins <jya@ieee.org> wrote: Floyd maintains that any signal whose values are restricted to a finite set -- IOW, "quantized" -- is digital. I cited a two-level analog signal and I can demonstrate a digital signal with a relatively large continuous range of values. His definitions are simply too restrictive to accommodate those, and he seems to
