|
|
 |
| found 15 articles for 0.305 sec |
  |
|
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 02:36:14PM -0500, Eric Haszlakiewicz wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 04:44:08PM +0200, Quentin Garnier wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 09:50:37AM -0400, Izaac wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 03:50:06AM +0300, Cem Kayali wrote:
> > > > I use modular Xorg from pkgsrc, and i would like to know advantages
> > > > and/or important differences between mentioned native |
|
 |
|
 |
Group: fa.netbsd.currentusers · Group Profile · Search for Izaac in fa.netbsd.currentusers
Author: Steven M. Bellovin
Date: Sep 22, 2008 18:24
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 04:04:37PM -0400, Izaac wrote: On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 04:44:08PM +0200, Quentin Garnier wrote: Please point me to your patches that enable us to use pkgsrc from build.sh and cross-compile X.org from about any POSIX system. I I have no interest in including graphical subsystems in my base operating system release. And when I do wish to use them, I have
|
| Show full article (4.58Kb) · Show article thread |
|
| On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 04:44:08PM +0200, Quentin Garnier wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 09:50:37AM -0400, Izaac wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 03:50:06AM +0300, Cem Kayali wrote:
> > > I use modular Xorg from pkgsrc, and i would like to know advantages
> > > and/or important differences between mentioned native Xorg and modular
> >
> > None. Rather than take advantage of the possibility |
|
 |
|
 |
Group: fa.netbsd.currentusers · Group Profile · Search for Izaac in fa.netbsd.currentusers
Author: Quentin Garnier
Date: Sep 22, 2008 13:14
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 09:50:37AM -0400, Izaac wrote: On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 03:50:06AM +0300, Cem Kayali wrote: I use modular Xorg from pkgsrc, and i would like to know advantages and/or important differences between mentioned native Xorg and modular None. Rather than take advantage of the possibility of finally divorcing the optional graphics subsystem into the framework
|
| Show full article (5.06Kb) · Show article thread |
|
 |
|
1 ·
2 ·
next |
|
|