...@gmail.com wrote: Is Lubos Motl's Dissertation "Nonperturbative Formulations of Superstring Theory...> well-defined non-perturbative lattice formulation. This definition is completely rigorous, ...apparently essential conflict between any sharp formulation and fundamental relativity. It may be...apparently essential conflict between any sharp formulation and fundamental relativity. It may be...

Is Lubos Motl's Dissertation "Nonperturbative Formulations of Superstring Theory" a ... well-defined non-perturbative lattice formulation. This definition is completely rigorous,... The problem is not just Lubos, but quite a few other ...essential conflict between any sharp formulation and fundamental relativity. It may...essential conflict between any sharp formulation and fundamental relativity. It may...

..., then, this is the real problem with quantum theory: the apparently essential conflict between any sharp formulation and fundamental relativity. It may be that a real synthesis of quantum and relativity theories requires not ... that "perturbative theories" are not as direct as non-, so whether or not this Motl guy was successful, is the question; any opinion on that? anyway, STs ...

...own chapter in the book !-) everyone in the early parts of your epistolary cut-and-paste job agrees that "perturbative theories" are not as direct as non-, so whether or not this Motl guy was successful, is the question; any opinion on that? anyway, STs just a reformulation in "higher dimensions," which are certainly well-accepted in mathematical physics, going way back to Hamiltonian ...

In my opinion, success in such enterprises requires a better understanding of the theory than has been achieved as yet. It is very difficult to assess whether this level of understanding is just around the corner or whether it will take many decades and several more revolutions. In the absence of this kind of confirmation, we can point to three qualitative "predictions" of superstring ...

http://www.theory.caltech.edu/people/jhs/strings/str154.html couldest thou explainit? A New Floating Point Arithmetic with Error Tracking Capability thus: oops, I'd put the wrong URL in my sig, because of the "W05" in two of them (well, the other article is good, two). I want to quote from the PDF -- I will!... I discovered this construction while contemplating a fragment from ...

I'd also have to say that you are a liar, but possibly the liar of Russell's paradox, or the barber who never leaves his own village: is he lying about not cutting his own hair -- does he have a secret customer-apprentice-nephew? that is, when you say that your so-called theory fits the experimental data, there's no way to know that, since you apparently have no way of quantifying your ...