... forth? In the dictionary definitions of "society" which I have provided to prove my arguments, and which you have conspicuously never provided to support yours. If Tom and Dick are... constitute a society, or to conceive or validate the concept of property. The same argument applies to animal possession. Are you suggesting animals can agree among themselves to loan one ...
... to secret crimes, and the concept of investigation was so primitive it was not even applied to scientific questions, let alone the proceedings of criminal justice. So much for all your "arguments." Most crime victims, in most places, could not expect any "social help" for either preventing or investigating the crime or pursuing the criminal (if known), apart from the help of ...
... its existence to you, lest you steal it. No third party is required here, either to constitute a society, or to conceive or validate the concept of property. The same argument applies to animal possession. Are you suggesting animals can agree among themselves to loan one another property, and upon the conditions for such loans, or that humans can't? You just don't know...
...>book, and likely not even revealed its existence to you, lest you steal it. No third party is required here, either to constitute a society, or to conceive or validate the concept of property. The same argument applies to animal possession. You just don't know how to function on a moral plane above that of the brute animal, so you assume there is no higher moral plane. -- Roy L
... improvements is generally a tiny fraction of the value with improvements, so this argument is like over a tiny fraction of a market. ... certainly not a royal Libertarian. Exactly. �It seems to me that Georgism is just another move in the direction the ideology of "tg" would have us ...
...so you have no definition, no facts, no logic, no arguments, just name calling and strawmen. The important lesson... a far greater choice of landlords now than advocates of Georgism call for. LOL! Â The landlord has nothing to do with ... but it is a simple logic that choice requires... choices. Georgism has reactionary consequences, therefore. False. If you say so. ...
... improvements is generally a tiny fraction of the value with improvements, so this argument is like over a tiny fraction of a market. ...> certainly not a royal Libertarian. Exactly. Â It seems to me that Georgism is just another move in the direction the ideology of "tg" would have us head...
...the slaves' freedom. I've snipped most of your slavery diatribe, since it was entirely irrelevant to the thrust of my comments. No, it proves that your premise and arguments are fallacious and evil. Abolitionists sought to abolish slavery because it was *inconsistent* with the understood concept of property, No, that is just another bald lie, as I have ...
...exists, then Alfie's claim is vacuous. When one of the alleged parties is a sociological or historical abstraction, the claim is not merely vacuous, it is nonsensical. None of them are present as a result of a pre-existing "social design," Wrong again. They exist because society, through division of labor, preservation and transmission of knowledge, security of property in...
... posterity. None of them are present as a result of a ... from the fact that your "arguments" are uniformly dishonest, fallacious and ... the benefits of some property presently belonging to others without paying...exact same fallacious and dishonest arguments -- especially ad hominems -- that slave...and transparently so? Bwahahahahahahahahaaa!!!! The arguments are not nonsensical in the...
