Interferomete
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
 Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...
found 15 articles for 0.252 sec
mpc755 wrote: [snip 175 lines of crap] > The symmetry of a C-60 molecule allows it to be able to maintain its > cohesion with its associated aether displacement. Hey fucking stooopid - C70 diffracts as does any molecule, as do photons, electrons, protons, and neutrons. You entirely missed the point of the experiment. Hey fucking stooopid - Colella-Overhauser-Werner and Bonse-Wroblewski     

Group: sci.physics.relativity · Group Profile · Search for Interferomete in sci.physics.relativity
Author: Uncle Al
Date: Jun 7, 2010 16:16

mpc755 wrote: [snip 175 lines of crap] The symmetry of a C-60 molecule allows it to be able to maintain its cohesion with its associated aether displacement. Hey fucking stooopid - C70 diffracts as does any molecule, as do photons, electrons, protons, and neutrons. You entirely missed the point of the experiment. Hey fucking stooopid - Colella-Overhauser-Werner and Bonse-Wroblewski
Show full article (0.60Kb) · Show article thread
mpc755 wrote: [snip rap] > A moving C-60 molecule has an associated aether displacement wave. The > C-60 molecule is always detected exiting a single slit because the > C-60 molecule always enters and exits a single slit. It is the > associated aether displacement wave which enters and exits multiple > slits. The associated aether displacement wave creates interference > upon exiting the slits     

Group: sci.physics · Group Profile · Search for Interferomete in sci.physics
Author: Uncle Al
Date: Jun 7, 2010 16:16

mpc755 wrote: [snip rap] A moving C-60 molecule has an associated aether displacement wave. The C-60 molecule is always detected exiting a single slit because the C-60 molecule always enters and exits a single slit. It is the associated aether displacement wave which enters and exits multiple slits. The associated aether displacement wave creates interference upon exiting the slits
Show full article (0.60Kb) · Show article thread
Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > Mike Dworetsky wrote: >> >> Really? Then how do you account for the following instruction to >> ham radio operators trying to talk to astronauts on ISS during >> scheduled sessions: >> >> a.. NOTE: The "DOPPLER EFFECT" means that the frequency of the space >> station will change slightly as it passes by your location. It is >> usual to adjust the "downlink" frequency     

Group: sci.physics.relativity · Group Profile · Search for Interferomete in sci.physics.relativity
Author: Uncle Al
Date: Jun 7, 2010 16:16

Mike Dworetsky wrote: Really? Then how do you account for the following instruction to ham radio operators trying to talk to astronauts on ISS during scheduled sessions: a.. NOTE: The "DOPPLER EFFECT" means that the frequency of the space station will change slightly as it passes by your location. It is usual to adjust the "downlink" frequency slightly on your receiver (if
Show full article (1.53Kb) · Show article thread
On 01.06.2010 00:31, Henry Wilson DSc wrote: > On Mon, 31 May 2010 12:11:54 +0200, "Paul B. Andersen" > <paul.b.andersen@somewhere.no> wrote: > >> On 30.05.2010 23:44, Henry Wilson DSc wrote: >>> On Sun, 30 May 2010 01:41:40 -0700, eric gisse<jowr.pi.nospam@gmail.com> > >>>>>> Affirmed in Newton's laws of motion. >>>>>> >>>>>> Certainly in agreement with the null results of Michelson     

Group: sci.physics · Group Profile · Search for Interferomete in sci.physics
Author: Uncle Al
Date: Jun 7, 2010 16:16

On Mon, 31 May 2010 01:09:52 -0700 (PDT), YKhan <yjkhan@gmail.com> wrote: Really, hasn't this been taken care of already by the Michelson-Morley experiments -- more than a century ago? That was thought to be the case and we have all been taught to believe that by our text books. But new research shows that the experiment may in fact have detected absolute motion. The Michelson
Show full article (1.53Kb) · Show article thread
On Mon, 31 May 2010 01:09:52 -0700 (PDT), YKhan <yjkhan@gmail.com> wrote: > >Really, hasn't this been taken care of already by the Michelson-Morley >experiments -- more than a century ago? > That was thought to be the case and we have all been taught to believe that by our text books. But new research shows that the experiment may in fact have detected absolute motion. The Michelson     

Group: sci.physics · Group Profile · Search for Interferomete in sci.physics
Author: Mike Dworetsky
Date: Jun 7, 2010 14:38

On May 7, 1:35 am, Peter Riedt <rie...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: Expansion = contraction Lorentz contraction formula L1=L*sqrt(1-(c/v)^2) applied to the parallel arm of MMX explained the null result of the interferometer experiment. My expansion formula L1=L*sqrt(1+(c/v)^2) applied to the perpendicular arm explains the same thing. (sigh) It's deja vu all over again... The
Show full article (3.22Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: sci.physics · Group Profile · Search for Interferomete in sci.physics
Author: Archimedes Plutonium
Date: Jun 7, 2010 12:23

Show full article (2.48Kb)
    

Group: sci.physics.relativity · Group Profile · Search for Interferomete in sci.physics.relativity
Author: Paul B. Andersen
Date: Jun 1, 2010 02:44

Show full article (2.06Kb)
    

Group: sci.physics.relativity · Group Profile · Search for Interferomete in sci.physics.relativity
Author: Surfer
Date: May 31, 2010 20:33

Show full article (2.64Kb)
    

Group: sci.physics · Group Profile · Search for Interferomete in sci.physics
Author: Surfer
Date: May 31, 2010 20:33

Show full article (2.64Kb)
    

Group: sci.physics.relativity · Group Profile · Search for Interferomete in sci.physics.relativity
Author: Jerry
Date: May 13, 2010 08:40

Show full article (2.30Kb)
1 · 2 · next