... your point. "Intelligent design" is what the advocates of "Intelligent design" say it is, and what they say it is, is, among other things, "theistic evolution." See http://www.intelligentdesignnetwork.org/NCBQ3_3HarrisCalvert.pdf What they object to is not evolution, but, like Gould and Lysenko, they object to Darwinism - and for much the same reasons - the desire to impose their own ...

... or say nothing directly but approvingly link to pages that approvingly describe theistic evolution as intelligent design, one much linked and much approved such page being http://www.intelligentdesignnetwork.org/NCBQ3_3HarrisCalvert.pdf -- ---------------------- We have the right to defend ourselves and our property, because of the kind of animals that we are. True law derives from ...

... design, but it is not the story the proponents of the intelligent design movement are pitching. What the proponents of Intelligent design are pitching is http://www.intelligentdesignnetwork.org/NCBQ3_3HarrisCalvert.pdf That pdf offers "justifications" of ID that were rejected in the Kitzmiller case, for example, Behe's testimony. Also, that pdf, from THE NATIONAL ...

... intelligent design, but it is not the story the proponents of the intelligent design movement are pitching. What the proponents of Intelligent design are pitching is http://www.intelligentdesignnetwork.org/NCBQ3_3HarrisCalvert.pdf Which says that "theistic evolution" is intelligent design - as of course it is - pretty much the same story as the left gives, only the left ...

...Evolution." If you google for "Intelligent Design", and pick those pages that are authored by advocates of Intelligent Design, you will find that they approvingly link to: http://www.intelligentdesignnetwork.org/NCBQ3_3HarrisCal vert.pdf Which advocates "theistic evolution", and makes it clear that the objection is not to evolution, but to the Origin of Species by Means of Natural...