Eric Stevens wrote: On Sun, 27 Jul 2008 00:30:37 -0500, Larry Swain <giles@poetic.com> wrote: Eric Stevens wrote: On Sat, 26 Jul 2008 11:21:38 -0500, Larry Swain <giles@poetic.com> wrote: --- snip ---- Sure, the dictionary is wrong in defining collapse. Thanks for setting us all straight. It is wrong when
Eric Stevens wrote: On Sat, 26 Jul 2008 11:21:38 -0500, Larry Swain <giles@poetic.com> wrote: --- snip ---- Sure, the dictionary is wrong in defining collapse. Thanks for setting us all straight. It is wrong when you deliberately select the wrong meaning from several alternatives. Indeed, as you have done consistently, even picking a meaning
Potroast wrote: And you let me know when you give up trying to explain to why gravity lensing works using Newton's version of the universe. I guess he wasn't doing science either? Newton's predictions of light bending was off by a factor of 2. The basic error in Newtonian Gravitation is that gravitational interactgion is instanteneous. This error shows in the misprediction
Tom Roberts wrote on Sat, 12 Apr 2008 16:41:42 +0000: Only if one accepts at face value your claims that most of classical physics is wrong. If you really think that then let me say you misunderstood i said. Tom Roberts wrote on Fri, 11 Apr 2008 15:36:41 -0500: The experiments have said NOTHING WHATSOEVER about whether or not the "geometrical interpretation" [#] of GR is
