In article <C19AE559.69AB9%%SNIT@CABLEONE.NET.lNVALID>, Snit <SNIT@CABLEONE.NET.lNVALID> wrote: "Jamie Hart" <usenet@jhart.ath.cx> stated in post 1165328757.3518.0@proxy02.news.clara.net on 12/5/06 7:25 AM: Snit wrote: "Jamie Hart" <usenet@jhart.ath.cx> stated in post 1165240270.86477.0@despina.uk.clara.net on 12/4/06 6:51 AM: But what if neither

Snit wrote: "Jamie Hart" <usenet@jhart.ath.cx> stated in post 1165240270.86477.0@despina.uk.clara.net on 12/4/06 6:51 AM: But what if neither iPhoto nor Photoshop elements was suitable for a particular image? swapping one editor for another (which is what you seem to be suggesting) doesn't help, it just shifts the problem. In that rather rare example the new and non

whistler wrote: I'm afraid I don't know Mr. B no matter, the only thing you can do with that jackass is lead him around with a beer. but I have driven commercially and so has Greg. In fact was on his way to do just that. I wasn't there , obviously, but imo, no trucker worth his salt would rear -end someone w/o leaving a swath of rubber unless the brakes failed or they were

We seem to be getting pointy. In usenete its a type medium. Mostly its meant to be short. When posts are short stuff gets left out. When it is typed I make it typodes instead. Please assume good faith. Remember I don't like SV too, It is just I also don't like one of the anti SV arguments. I most don't like it because, it wont fly, they(SV users) wont believe it, hell, I might yet be swayed