...:)2+&BQ8L8,VK<R+&CQX\@0XJ\&$C&R(A\0IU<J=$`RY<P8\J< MB8T%%BY$DD+!A@X0AB9%%=$!V@B:U$P2A\.*JH4D4%%48M;PMP8B0#!TZM8LS8L MT6<BP@!0`B#\29 -I)UF=;*A18NADDED$1I-V*7+BH,R`CT-Y54@%%#L``@L> M3!B BC]5!*I86@4QE3]_M#XT$!4&0@,J;L!PB? `A N@'Q!\<,$JPZ$:57!. MN&+NR@.H$\)^.5LA[-@6:TOL(W9%%@!4MH@A'VJ?/38.0:/44B*0M-K,#:;%%Q M.TGAV[@&5R R:=!*EZ=\ZOX01-K:-\(JCR%%#=KITL<#'DDF0<#)?OD(#=U6K MOK%%E"_^H6QCT`&D7/ "!!061...

...:)2+&BQ8L8,VK<R+&CQX\@0XJ\&$C&R(A\0IU<J=$`RY<P8\J< MB8T%%BY$DD+!A@X0AB9%%=$!V@B:U$P2A\.*JH4D4%%48M;PMP8B0#!TZM8LS8L MT6<BP@!0`B#\29 -I)UF=;*A18NADDED$1I-V*7+BH,R`CT-Y54@%%#L``@L> M3!B BC]5!*I86@4QE3]_M#XT$!4&0@,J;L!PB? `A N@'Q!\<,$JPZ$:57!. MN&+NR@.H$\)^.5LA[-@6:TOL(W9%%@!4MH@A'VJ?/38.0:/44B*0M-K,#:;%%Q M.TGAV[@&5R R:=!*EZ=\ZOX01-K:-\(JCR%%#=KITL<#'DDF0<#)?OD(#=U6K MOK%%E"_^H6QCT`&D7/ "!!061...

...:)2+&BQ8L8,VK<R+&CQX\@0XJ\&$C&R(A\0IU<J=$`RY<P8\J< MB8T%%BY$DD+!A@X0AB9%%=$!V@B:U$P2A\.*JH4D4%%48M;PMP8B0#!TZM8LS8L MT6<BP@!0`B#\29 -I)UF=;*A18NADDED$1I-V*7+BH,R`CT-Y54@%%#L``@L> M3!B BC]5!*I86@4QE3]_M#XT$!4&0@,J;L!PB? `A N@'Q!\<,$JPZ$:57!. MN&+NR@.H$\)^.5LA[-@6:TOL(W9%%@!4MH@A'VJ?/38.0:/44B*0M-K,#:;%%Q M.TGAV[@&5R R:=!*EZ=\ZOX01-K:-\(JCR%%#=KITL<#'DDF0<#)?OD(#=U6K MOK%%E"_^H6QCT`&D7/ "!!061...

.../blib/lib:/usr/local/src/CPAN/build/Class-Delegator-0.08-I86778/blib/arch:/usr/local/src/CPAN/build/Class-Delegator-! 0.08-I86 778/blib/lib PERL5OPT = PERL5_CPANPLUS_IS_RUNNING = 15093 PERL5_CPAN_IS_RUNNING = 15093 PERL5_CPAN_IS_RUNNING_IN_RECURSION = 14919,15093 PERL_EXTUTILS_AUTOINSTALL = --defaultdeps PERL_HTML_DISPLAY_CLASS = HTML::Display::Mozilla SHELL ...

...; : <> - 0= 0= ; : 2/ D 2 FM/MOD SWAP DROP ; Steve Pelc notes in an other reply that POP and PUSH instructions may be unfavourable for certain i86 processors. In the code examples you can see that ciforth uses them instead of faster instructions. This has to do with optimisation philosophy. I've published about optimisation in this forum before and you ...

...+ 1 + ; : <> - 0= 0= ; : 2/ D 2 FM/MOD SWAP DROP ; Steve Pelc notes in an other reply that POP and PUSH instructions may be unfavourable for certain i86 processors. In the code examples you can see that ciforth uses them instead of faster instructions. This has to do with optimisation philosophy. I've published about optimisation in this forum before and you can read ...

...this case lina) as version 1.0. E.g if I fetch version 1.0 of lina, I get a working version of good old fig-forth. If I fetch version 1.0 of my Dec Alpha ciforth, I get some i86 ciforth. Version 1.0 of renesas ciforth is some 6809 ciforth. (An indeed versions 1.12 is the first version that is even accepted by the renesas assembler.) In this way all diffs are present in the archive. ...

...this case lina) as version 1.0. E.g if I fetch version 1.0 of lina, I get a working version of good old fig-forth. If I fetch version 1.0 of my Dec Alpha ciforth, I get some i86 ciforth. Version 1.0 of renesas ciforth is some 6809 ciforth. (An indeed versions 1.12 is the first version that is even accepted by the renesas assembler.) In this way all diffs are present in the archive. ...

Użytkownik "see_you" <c5u@gazeta.pl> napisał w wiadomości news:fqbjb8$i86$1@inews.gazeta.pl... Użytkownik "Andrzej Adam Filip" <anfi@poczta.onet.pl> napisał w wiadomości "see_you" <c5u@gazeta.pl> pisze: Nie zapomniałem również słów bardzo wysokiej rangi *MATOŁKA* w zieleninie w Iraku że tego żołnierza WP zabili "terroryści". Kto strzela do obcego wojska *walczą...

legrape@gmail.com wrote: I have a Fortran program calling a C module to do all the numerical work. I compile using g95 (and g95 loads the executable) and gcc on a 64bit linux machine using -O3 optimization. I get the big addresses and 64bit integers as desired, but the C module comsumes about 4-5x as much CPU time than if I run the same code compiled on a 32bit linux box. I...