|
|
 |
| found 134 articles for 0.304 sec |
  |
| On 21 Jun, 15:58, MUGSY0...@aol.com wrote:
> All true and, I'd add, sadly so.
>
> Greg is correct to state that such baronies, while still legally in
> existence, really serve no functional purpose. They are archaic
> remnants of tremendous landholdings and, now, serve only as social
> dignities. Further, as an American, the term "fish out of water"
> seems very true. Trust me, having some |
|
 |
|
 |
Group: alt.socialsecuritydisability · Group Profile · Search for Humilty in alt.socialsecuritydisability
Author: Six String Stu
Date: Jul 16, 2008 11:54
All true and, I'd add, sadly so. Greg is correct to state that such baronies, while still legally in existence, really serve no functional purpose. They are archaic remnants of tremendous landholdings and, now, serve only as social dignities. Further, as an American, the term "fish out of water" seems very true. Trust me, having some experience with such, claiming this in the US will garger
|
| Show full article (1.29Kb) · Show article thread |
|
|
|
1 ·
2 ·
3 ·
4 ·
5 ·
6 ·
7 ·
8 ·
9 ·
next |
|
|
