Hsbp
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
 Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...
found 11 articles for 0.152 sec
Ahh Rich I bow down to your superior ability to glean information from the question "What's wrong with this syntax?" Maybe I'm just getting older and more cynical, but I keep coming across what are supposedly significant results from a distance, but when you look a little closer, it turns out they've just ignored 95%% of the data, and more or less based the results on heresay. Or then     

Group: sci.stat.consult · Group Profile · Search for Hsbp in sci.stat.consult
Author: fred.sutton
Date: Aug 29, 2008 00:11

Altho the previous answers are correct, I'm not convinced that they, or your original, would give you the results you would want. With your original message it wasn't exactly clear what you were looking for help on. Anything that doesn't fit the criteria of the DO IFs and IFs, will have a missing value in HSBP and be excluded from any further analysis, which strikes me as either an odd way
Show full article (2.06Kb) · Show article thread
On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 14:40:57 -0700 (PDT), Bruce Weaver <bweaver@lakeheadu.ca> wrote: >On Aug 27, 3:12 pm, Chrys <despinaa_de...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> THANKS IN ADVANCE! >> >> DO IF sex=1 . > > >Well for one thing, after a DO IF, you need an END IF. E.g., > >DO IF (sex EQ 1). >- statements here (e.g., compute commands) . >END IF. > >What do you want SPSS to do if sex=1? You've not     

Group: sci.stat.consult · Group Profile · Search for Hsbp in sci.stat.consult
Author: fred.sutton
Date: Aug 27, 2008 23:48

On Aug 27, 6:12 pm, Chrys <despinaa_de...@yahoo.com> wrote: Thanks Bruce for replying! In relation to sex var... what I was trying to do is to execute the statements below for example only for males. Therefore... how would you suggest that I should modify the whole thing? DO IF (sex EQ 1) . - IF (age =10 & age <11 & HeightPercentileforage>=5 & HeightPercentileforage
Show full article (2.19Kb) · Show article thread
On Aug 27, 3:12 pm, Chrys <despinaa_de...@yahoo.com> wrote: > THANKS IN ADVANCE! > > DO IF sex=1 . Well for one thing, after a DO IF, you need an END IF. E.g., DO IF (sex EQ 1). - statements here (e.g., compute commands) . END IF. What do you want SPSS to do if sex=1? You've not told it to do anything. > EXECUTE. > > IF (age >=10 & age <11 & HeightPercentileforage>=5 &     

Group: sci.stat.consult · Group Profile · Search for Hsbp in sci.stat.consult
Author: RichUlrich
Date: Aug 27, 2008 15:36

> From: Debian Bug Tracking System owner@bugs.debian.org Subject: re: linux-image-2.6.20-1-686: SCSI disks initialised too late for mdadm Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 10:40:33 +0200 not a kernel bug, use rootdelay boot arg. thanks for report. -- maks From: Debian Bug Tracking System owner@bugs.debian.org Subject: linux-image-2.6.20-1-686: SCSI disks initialised too
Show full article (1.30Kb) · Show article thread
I've done my experiment with initramfs-tools - putting a 'sleep 10' before mount_root makes my machine boot the kernel, as I suspected in my original email: # diff -u /usr/share/initramfs-tools/init{.orig,} --- /usr/share/initramfs-tools/init.orig 2007-03-07 22:30:42.000000000 +0000 +++ /usr/share/initramfs-tools/init 2007-05-11 14:33:55.000000000 +0100 @@ -145,6 +145,12 @@ run_scripts     

Group: sci.stat.consult · Group Profile · Search for Hsbp in sci.stat.consult
Author: Bruce Weaver
Date: Aug 27, 2008 15:20

Package: linux-image-2.6.20-1-686 Version: 2.6.20-3 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system Hi, I've filed this bug under the this package since, although one could argue that initramfs-tools has the problem, the difference appears to be kernel version. My machine is configured with an software raid 0 (mdadm) root filesystem, composed of two SCSI drives. If
Show full article (0.67Kb) · Show article thread
Package: linux-image-2.6.20-1-686 Version: 2.6.20-3 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system Hi, I've filed this bug under the this package since, although one could argue that initramfs-tools has the problem, the difference appears to be kernel version. My machine is configured with an software raid 0 (mdadm) root filesystem, composed of two SCSI drives. If     

Group: sci.stat.consult · Group Profile · Search for Hsbp in sci.stat.consult
Author: Bruce Weaver
Date: Aug 27, 2008 14:40

Show full article (0.70Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: sci.stat.consult · Group Profile · Search for Hsbp in sci.stat.consult
Author: Chrys
Date: Aug 27, 2008 12:12

Show full article (0.30Kb)
    

Group: linux.debian.kernel · Group Profile · Search for Hsbp in linux.debian.kernel
Author: Debian Bug Tracking System
Date: Jun 21, 2008 01:50

Show full article (11.06Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: linux.debian.bugs.rc · Group Profile · Search for Hsbp in linux.debian.bugs.rc
Author: Simon A. Boggis
Date: May 11, 2007 08:40

Show full article (6.57Kb)
    

Group: linux.debian.kernel · Group Profile · Search for Hsbp in linux.debian.kernel
Author: Simon A. Boggis
Date: May 4, 2007 04:00

Show full article (9.43Kb)
    

Group: linux.debian.bugs.dist · Group Profile · Search for Hsbp in linux.debian.bugs.dist
Author: Simon A. Boggis
Date: May 4, 2007 04:00

Show full article (9.43Kb)
1 · 2 · next