On Feb 12, 1:36 pm, Dave Reitzes <dreit...@aol.com> wrote: On Feb 11, 10:30�am, alo...@maine.rr.com wrote: thanks Dave, as you continue to illustrate your political blindspots - would that your contempt were not reserved merely for the History Channel, but also for CBS �with its false re-creations of the shootings, or its correspondent Dan Rather who not only lied
On Feb 11, 10:27�pm, burgundy <WBurgha...@aol.com> wrote: On Feb 11, 11:38�am, Anthony Marsh <anthony_ma...@comcast.net> wrote: Dave Reitzes wrote: I have to thank the History Channel for putting things in perspective. Just when I think things couldn't get much loopier than some of the beliefs and crazy "witnesses" endorsed at this newsgroup, the History
Muckraker Report | August 31, 2007 Maher Osseiran The History Channel has produced a documentary titled 9/11 Conspiracies Fact or Fiction . It aired on Monday, August 20, 2007. According to the abstract, the documentary examines the various conspiracy theories espoused on the Internet, in articles and in public forums that attempt to explain the 9/11 attacks. It includes theories that the
Muckraker Report | August 31, 2007 Maher Osseiran The History Channel has produced a documentary titled 9/11 Conspiracies Fact or Fiction . It aired on Monday, August 20, 2007. According to the abstract, the documentary examines the various conspiracy theories espoused on the Internet, in articles and in public forums that attempt to explain the 9/11 attacks. It includes theories that the
