... to just accept them at your say so. That's not how reasonable discourse works. If you get offended at people questioning your tightly held beliefs, thaqt's not my problem. As a skeptic, I hold the right to question any fantastical claims and demand evidence. Move on, son. You do not have the right to demand ...
...'t expect everyone to just accept them at your say so. That's not how reasonable discourse works. If you get offended at people questioning your tightly held beliefs, thaqt's not my problem. As a skeptic, I hold the right to question any fantastical claims and demand evidence. Move on, son.
... and I find it laughable at best that the scientific community rejects it due to the lack of "independent verifiable evidence". Laughable? Why? That's the only way science can study anything. Chi has nothing to do with science. Why should it be measured by that yardstick? It is a ridiculous argument. Do you have a better way of studying reality? Or are you ...
...I find it laughable at best that the scientific community rejects it due to the lack of "independent verifiable evidence". Laughable? Why? That's the only way science can study anything. Chi has nothing to do with science. Why should it be measured by that yardstick? It is a ridiculous argument. Do you have a better way of studying reality? Or are you assuming your ...
... I find it laughable at best that the scientific community rejects it due to the lack of "independent verifiable evidence". Laughable? Why? That's the only way science can study anything. Chi has nothing to do with science. Why should it be measured by that yardstick? It is a ridiculous argument. Keep in mind as well, that the very people who would have the most ...
...: KStahl wrote: But in some ways the chi is a mystical concept. As a result, words themselves cannot express the essential nature of chi. Sure they can. Bunk, hokum, malarkey, horse hockey all ...t required. Don't be surprised if it turns out that chi ends up being very important Nothing would surprise me ...
KStahl wrote: But in some ways the chi is a mystical concept. As a result, words themselves cannot express the essential nature of chi. Sure they can. Bunk, hokum, malarkey, horse hockey all immediately...'t required. Don't be surprised if it turns out that chi ends up being very important Nothing would surprise me more...
KStahl wrote: But in some ways the chi is a mystical concept. As a result, words themselves cannot express the essential nature of chi. Sure they can. Bunk, hokum, malarkey, horse hockey all immediately come to mind.
...: A guide to Taoist Yoga & Chi Kung by Eric Yudelove" I was...Eric Yudelove explained the concept of Chi. If you do know what he...dark mystery about the nature of chi. Just a simple search of ... people about the nature of chi. But in some ways the ... express the essential nature of chi. They can only provide perceptions ... certain aspects of chi. To really understand chi you must learn ...
Hey does anybody know about '"100 Days To Better Health, Good Sex & Long Life: A guide to Taoist Yoga & Chi Kung by Eric Yudelove" I was wondering if one knows exactly how Eric Yudelove explained the concept of Chi. If you do know what he was talking about please explain to me. Thank you.
