On Jun 24, 1:15 am, George Orwell <nob...@mixmaster.it> wrote: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- 1 Incumbent politicians were required at gun-point to produce demonstrable results which their respective party's nominees casually promise, campaign promises which, historically, have seldom if ever been kept, once those politicians got elected? Is it not incumbent upon politicians
George Orwell wrote: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- 1 Incumbent politicians were required at gun-point to produce demonstrable results which their respective party's nominees casually promise, campaign promises which, historically, have seldom if ever been kept, once those politicians got elected? Is it not incumbent upon politicians to keep their promises?
George Orwell wrote: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- 1 Incumbent politicians were required at gun-point to produce demonstrable results which their respective party's nominees casually promise, campaign promises which, historically, have seldom if ever been kept, once those politicians got elected? Is it not incumbent upon politicians to keep their promises?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- 1 Incumbent politicians were required at gun-point to produce demonstrable results which their respective party's nominees casually promise, campaign promises which, historically, have seldom if ever been kept, once those politicians got elected? Is it not incumbent upon politicians to keep their promises? I'll tell you what would happen. The politicians
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- 1 Incumbent politicians were required at gun-point to produce demonstrable results which their respective party's nominees casually promise, campaign promises which, historically, have seldom if ever been kept, once those politicians got elected? Is it not incumbent upon politicians to keep their promises? I'll tell you what would happen. The politicians
