"Chad" <cbstun@safemail.com> wrote in message news:4836c989$0$30466$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au... "digitect" <digitectNO@SPAMdancingpaper.com> wrote in message news:pan.2008.05.21.22.07.17@SPAMdancingpaper.com... On Wed, 21 May 2008 12:00:09 -0700, Lloyd wrote: On May 21, 1:55 am, "Chad" wrote: "Mike P" wrote in message no other formula gets 760BHP +

<brafield@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:4d81d47b-a3e1-4089-a387-840b7fead966@i36g2000prf.googlegroups.com... On May 20, 10:55 pm, "Chad" <cbs...@safemail.com> wrote: "Mike P" <priv...@privacy.net> wrote in message news:69gbl6F32ip8sU1@mid.individual.net... "forty" <cforteR3M...@THISgmail.com> wrote in message news:69g5p5F32c2poU3@mid.individual.net...

Ray O'Hara wrote: "Phil Carmody" <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message news:87iqx8ch00.fsf@nonospaz.fatphil.org... However, would you really want to be caught comparing a 5.8L engine to a 2.4L engine? It's OK, in this case, of course, as you've reinforced the comment about the technology. http://www.hendrickmotorsports.com/tech_engine_vr360

On Wed, 21 May 2008 12:00:09 -0700, Lloyd wrote: On May 21, 1:55 am, "Chad" wrote: "Mike P" wrote in message no other formula gets 760BHP + out of an NA engine for example This nascar engine claims 770HP, is NA and also uses a carbie... http://www.hendrickmotorsports.com/tech_engine_vr360.asp It's also 5.9 liters. If an F1 engine were that size, and hp

Chad wrote: "Phil Carmody" <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message news:87iqx8ch00.fsf@nonospaz.fatphil.org... "Chad" <cbstun@safemail.com> writes: >"Mike P" <privacy@privacy.net> wrote in message news:69gbl6F32ip8sU1@mid.individual.net... "forty" <cforteR3M0V3@THISgmail.com> wrote in message news:69g5p5F32c2poU3@mid.individual.net...