On Mar 5, 3:09�pm, Dave Heil <k...@frontiernet.net> wrote: N...@aol.com wrote: On Mar 3, 8:23pm, Dave Heil <k...@frontiernet.net> wrote: I find it impressive that Hallicrafters made so many different receiver models in so few years (say, 1945-1960). Loads and loads. �Most were variations on a common theme with styling changes though octal tubes might have been replaced

alt.binaries.ham-radio. Does NOT exist . Why did you post this mis-information ! I copied alt.binaries.ham-radio. into Google "Search this group" , NO RECORDS FOUND .. ________________________________________ On Jul 22, 1:36 pm, Isis <isis55...@hotpop.com> wrote: On Sun, 22 Jul 2007 11:57:16 -0400, TT <nob...@nospam.com> wrote: :SB101?

N2EY@aol.com wrote: On Mar 3, 8:23�pm, Dave Heil <k...@frontiernet.net> wrote: I find it impressive that Hallicrafters made so many different receiver models in so few years (say, 1945-1960). Loads and loads. Most were variations on a common theme with styling changes though octal tubes might have been replaced by loctals or miniature 7 or 9 pin types. Collins had two-and-a