... wrote: You can post the link and comment on it without a trademark tedious anti-Oyster rant. No ones forcing you to read it. No-one's forcing you to post it.... "I know I am, but what are you"-style argument because deep down you know the pro-Oyster idiots don't have a real argument to back up your case. Boltar's real name revealed...? ...
....com> wrote: You can post the link and comment on it without a trademark tedious anti-Oyster rant. No ones forcing you to read it. No-one's forcing you to post it.... childish "I know I am, but what are you"-style argument because deep down you know the pro-Oyster idiots don't have a real argument to back up your case. Boltar's real name revealed...? -- ...
... <james.s.far...@gmail.com> wrote: You can post the link and comment on it without a trademark tedious anti-Oyster rant. No ones forcing you to read it. No-one's forcing you to post it. (Did you all ... to a silly, childish "I know I am, but what are you"-style argument because deep down you know the pro-Oyster idiots don't have a real argument to back up your case.
...Sun, 10 Aug 2008 12:05:47 -0700 (PDT), Boltar <boltar2...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: On 10 Aug, 14:50, James Farrar <james.s.far...@gmail.com> wrote: You can post the link and comment on it without a trademark tedious anti-Oyster rant. No ones forcing you to read it. No-one's forcing you to post it. (Did you all spot what I did there?) Talk bollox? B2003
On Sun, 10 Aug 2008 12:05:47 -0700 (PDT), Boltar <boltar2003@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: On 10 Aug, 14:50, James Farrar <james.s.far...@gmail.com> wrote: You can post the link and comment on it without a trademark tedious anti-Oyster rant. No ones forcing you to read it. No-one's forcing you to post it. (Did you all spot what I did there?)
......@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: AFAIK mifare doesn't support AES. According to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIFARE, they do. The article also mentions a replacement card for the current Oyster/MIFARE Classic card that will support AES. Interesting, didn't spot a mention of AES on their site, just DES, but then I didn't look that hard. In that case theres even less excuse ...
...en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIFARE, they do. The article also mentions a replacement card for the current Oyster/MIFARE Classic card that will support AES. Interesting, didn't spot a mention of AES on their ... the range one. Does anyone know if these cards will be as fast as the current Oyster cards, or if they will require travellers to hold the card still on the reader longer? ...
...to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIFARE , they do. The article also mentions a replacement card for the current Oyster/MIFARE Classic card that will support AES. Does anyone know if these cards will be as fast as the current Oyster cards, or if they will require travellers to hold the card still on the reader longer? -- jhk
On 10 Aug, 14:50, James Farrar <james.s.far...@gmail.com> wrote: You can post the link and comment on it without a trademark tedious anti-Oyster rant. No ones forcing you to read it. B2003
...<il...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: Have you got anything intelligent to say about it, or are you just airing your well-known anti-Oyster views? I didn't notice anyone else posting the link. What would you like, a discourse on its technical merits? You can post the link and comment on it without a trademark tedious anti-Oyster rant.
