<News+13894@Torrens.org.uk> wrote in message news:4f740a367bNews+13894@Torrens.org.uk... In article <HM4QUSRhFuuHFAnn@perry.co.uk>, Roland Perry <roland@perry.co.uk> wrote: In message <4f7392a26bNews+13894@Torrens.org.uk>, at 12:47:40 on Tue, 19 Feb 2008, News+13894@Torrens.org.uk remarked: noise polution would be a very significant objection. However electric drives
Roland Perry <roland@perry.co.uk> wrote: In message <Aoudncs6xZJQJSfanZ2dnUVZ8tLinZ2d@bt.com>, at 11:09:01 on Tue, 19 Feb 2008, Jon Green <jonsg@deadspam.com> remarked: magwitch wrote: The upper Cam should remain unmotorised. Even if they are electric organic and carbon neutral. Why? The "baddy" here is motorised punts. The fuel they use is neither here
In message <ntCdnSqy7LJSnSfanZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@pipex.net>, at 22:04:17 on Mon, 18 Feb 2008, danw <danwoodford@googlesmailservice.com> remarked: So, does cam.misc have an opinion? The website is full of special pleading: "only" this and "only" that. And zero carbon motors - yeah right - what matters is zero carbon battery charging [although for a project like this is so down in the noise
Bill wrote: I live in Sudbury, Suffolk and have a G/F in Northampton. (Briar Hill). I hate the A14 with a passion, so tend to endure the A14 to the A428 then work my way through to Bedford. Is there a sensible way round Bedford without going through the town centre. Not so bad on the bike, but took me half an hour the other day in the car, the town was gridlocked. I did once stay
