Rita wrote: On 20 Sep 2006 16:32:33 -0700, "js" <jonathansmith99@yahoo.com> wrote: Again, you miss the point entirely. It is NOT the im;pactfulnmess of the message that caused the court to rule in the way they did. It is the courts argument that by allowing the speech to occur, in fact facilitating its occurence by providing the forum and PA system, it can be inferred

"Rita" <nitany_98@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:abk3h2dk6dif5dchl84a8ssh3csdq0aa7i@4ax.com... On 20 Sep 2006 16:32:33 -0700, "js" <jonathansmith99@yahoo.com> wrote: Again, you miss the point entirely. It is NOT the im;pactfulnmess of the message that caused the court to rule in the way they did. It is the courts argument that by allowing the speech to occur, in fact

Rita wrote: On 20 Sep 2006 12:58:32 -0700, "js" <jonathansmith99@yahoo.com> wrote: Rita wrote: On 20 Sep 2006 10:42:13 -0700, "js" <jonathansmith99@yahoo.com> wrote: Rumpelstiltskin wrote: On 20 Sep 2006 06:19:46 -0700, "js" <jonathansmith99@yahoo.com> wrote: There you go - confirm EXACTLY what I said. It reflects the

Diana wrote: "Dave" <a@b.com> wrote in message news:kZOdnWC844uTWjLZnZ2dnUVZ_sadnZ2d@giganews.com... Diana wrote: "Dave" <supradave@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:feGdnQ_SuoFRSTPZnZ2dnUVZ_omdnZ2d@giganews.com... Diana wrote: <snip> Sorry, had to leave suddenly. Now, you want to tell me what's wrong with the above picture?

"Dave" <a@b.com> wrote in message news:kZOdnWC844uTWjLZnZ2dnUVZ_sadnZ2d@giganews.com... Diana wrote: "Dave" <supradave@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:feGdnQ_SuoFRSTPZnZ2dnUVZ_omdnZ2d@giganews.com... Diana wrote: <snip> Sorry, had to leave suddenly. Now, you want to tell me what's wrong with the above picture? Equal protection under the