Glacio
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

found 9 articles for 0.303 sec
<snip> > Gee that's a convincing argument Science Briefs Sea Level Rise, After the Ice Melted and Today By Vivien Gornitz — January 2007 Climate warming is expected to result in rising sea level. Should this occur, coastal cities, ports, and wetlands would be threatened with more frequent flooding, increased beach erosion, and saltwater encroachment into coastal streams and aquifers     

Group: aus.invest · Group Profile · Search for Glacio in aus.invest
Author: Vote out Brendan Nelson
Date: Jan 30, 2008 04:36

<snip> Gee that's a convincing argument Science Briefs Sea Level Rise, After the Ice Melted and Today By Vivien Gornitz — January 2007 Climate warming is expected to result in rising sea level. Should this occur, coastal cities, ports, and wetlands would be threatened with more frequent flooding, increased beach erosion, and saltwater encroachment into coastal streams and aquifers
Show full article (8.97Kb) · Show article thread
<snip> > Gee that's a convincing argument Science Briefs Sea Level Rise, After the Ice Melted and Today By Vivien Gornitz — January 2007 Climate warming is expected to result in rising sea level. Should this occur, coastal cities, ports, and wetlands would be threatened with more frequent flooding, increased beach erosion, and saltwater encroachment into coastal streams and aquifers     

Group: sci.skeptic · Group Profile · Search for Glacio in sci.skeptic
Author: Vote out Brendan Nelson
Date: Jan 30, 2008 04:36

Keith Willshaw wrote: It has been surveyed many times, your fictional warm valleys with vegetation dont exist. Note the drainage system of the area has been mapped in considerable. No underground tunnels or hidden rivers, just glaciers and massive icesheets. References 1. Julian, P. R., Massman, W. J. & Levanon, N. Bull. Am. met. Soc. 58, 936-948 (1977).
Show full article (8.97Kb) · Show article thread
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 17:22:30 +0100, James Nicoll <jdnicoll@panix.com> wrote: > POD: 4000 - 3000 AD, in a repeat of the events that caused > the Messinian Salinity Crisis of 6,000,000 BC (Although at > an exceptional and unexplained rate [1]), what came to be known > as the Straits of Gibraltar in OTL close. What in OTL would > have been called Gibraltar and Morocco are now accessable to     

Group: aus.general · Group Profile · Search for Glacio in aus.general
Author: Vote out Brendan Nelson
Date: Jan 30, 2008 04:36

Received: from [71.121.190.53] by openbrick.kicks-ass.net (ArGoSoft Mail Server Pro for WinNT/2000/XP, Version 1.8 (1.8.6.0)); Fri, 17 Nov 2006 09:13:09 -0500 Received: from glacio.com (140928904 [143470648]) by pool-71-121-190-53.sttlwa.dsl-w.verizon.net (Qmailv1) with ESMTP id 0AC28DC97E for <[devnull]>; Fri, 17 Nov 2006 09:13:36 -0500 Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 09:13:36 -0500 From: "Falling
Show full article (8.97Kb) · Show article thread
Peter Alaca wrote: > Tom McDonald wrote: > news:1154289758.087719.105380@s13g2000cwa.googlegroups.com > > Peter Alaca wrote: > >> Erik Hammerstad wrote: > >>> Jean wrote: > > >>>> About 130 meters since the last glaciation(-11000yr) is the general > >>>> figure agreed on > >>>> but 150 is within the range and would not gender any argument! > > >>> No, the accepted range is 120-130 m. And     

Group: rec.aviation.military · Group Profile · Search for Glacio in rec.aviation.military
Author: Stephen Harding
Date: Dec 3, 2007 03:32

Tom McDonald wrote: news:1154289758.087719.105380@s13g2000cwa.googlegroups.com Peter Alaca wrote: Erik Hammerstad wrote: Jean wrote: About 130 meters since the last glaciation(-11000yr) is the general figure agreed on but 150 is within the range and would not gender any argument! No, the accepted range is 120-130 m. And there is no need to argue with anyone
Show full article (1.72Kb) · Show article thread
Peter Alaca wrote: > Erik Hammerstad wrote: news:4j4celF6abn5U1@individual.net > > Jean wrote: > > >> About 130 meters since the last glaciation(-11000yr) is the general > >> figure agreed on > >> but 150 is within the range and would not gender any argument! > > > No, the accepted range is 120-130 m. And there is no need to argue > > with anyone claiming so obviously a wrong figure as 150     

Group: soc.history.whatif · Group Profile · Search for Glacio in soc.history.whatif
Author: Jenny Brien
Date: Oct 17, 2007 12:37

Show full article (3.31Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: news.admin.net-abuse.sightings · Group Profile · Search for Glacio in news.admin.net-abuse.sightings
Author: sightings
Date: Nov 18, 2006 15:12

Show full article (1.15Kb)
    

Group: soc.history.ancient · Group Profile · Search for Glacio in soc.history.ancient
Author: Tom McDonald
Date: Jul 30, 2006 13:20

Show full article (1.62Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: soc.history.ancient · Group Profile · Search for Glacio in soc.history.ancient
Author: Peter Alaca
Date: Jul 30, 2006 13:12

Show full article (1.49Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: soc.history.ancient · Group Profile · Search for Glacio in soc.history.ancient
Author: Tom McDonald
Date: Jul 30, 2006 13:02

Show full article (2.19Kb) · Show article thread