On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 20:58:21 -0500, Day Brown <daybrown@daybrown.org> wrote: Government Shill #2 wrote: On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 13:14:11 -0500, VTR <vexjorge@gmx.us> wrote: Less Than Half the World Believes al Qaeda Was Behind 9/11 Attacks If fifty million people say a foolish thing, it is still a foolish thing. Anatole France (1844 - 1924) So, if all you debunkers believe
Day Brown wrote: Government Shill #2 wrote: On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 13:14:11 -0500, VTR <vexjorge@gmx.us> wrote: Less Than Half the World Believes al Qaeda Was Behind 9/11 Attacks If fifty million people say a foolish thing, it is still a foolish thing. Anatole France (1844 - 1924) So, if all you debunkers believe the official 911 report, you are foolish also? Who getsta
Government Shill #2 wrote: On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 13:14:11 -0500, VTR <vexjorge@gmx.us> wrote: Less Than Half the World Believes al Qaeda Was Behind 9/11 Attacks If fifty million people say a foolish thing, it is still a foolish thing. Anatole France (1844 - 1924) So, if all you debunkers believe the official 911 report, you are foolish also? Who getsta decide what 'foolish'
Jerry Kraus wrote: Sounds like an elaborate rationalization of the simple and obvious fact the scientists, currently, haven't the slightest idea what they're doing. How about doing a better job on pragmatic reductionism, solving some real world problems, and not trying to justify scientific incompetence on the basis of a theistic conception of human impotence? Sure. Just a sec
DG wrote: Rich <someone@someplace.not> wrote: DG wrote: Rich <someone@someplace.not> wrote: Day Brown wrote: Look Rich. Nukes, coal, and gas all get subsidies of some kind or other. It aint like we are trying to figure out what the free market fair value is. Nukes would make sense, but with the war on terrorism, they'd be such a rich target zone nobody
