Geace
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

found 264 articles for 0.304 sec
Dr.UgoGagliardelli wrote: > il 02/10/2007 0.08, Scrive Barb 40729568: >> Thanks for the response, I have googled for answers. :) And we are >> pre-Aurora version of System21 too. I was hoping that someone else >> was, like us, running an older version and has done an OS update to v5r4. > I do not know why, but a customer of mine was told by the sw editor that > his System21 will have not     

Group: comp.sys.ibm.as400.misc · Group Profile · Search for Geace in comp.sys.ibm.as400.misc
Author: Barb
Date: Nov 7, 2007 17:03

Thanks for the response, I have googled for answers. :) And we are pre-Aurora version of System21 too. I was hoping that someone else was, like us, running an older version and has done an OS update to v5r4. xyzzy wrote: On Sep 13, 11:41 pm, Barb <gryper_1...@yahoo.com> wrote: We are getting ready to upgrade our iSeries to v5r4 from v5r2. We're running an older version of Geac System21
Show full article (0.82Kb) · Show article thread
On Sep 13, 11:41 pm, Barb <gryper_1...@yahoo.com> wrote: > We are getting ready to upgrade our iSeries to v5r4 from v5r2. We're > running an older version of Geac System21 - v3.5.2b and Geac System21 > Explorer v3.5.1 (Sept 2001 release). > > Does anyone know if there will be a problem with our System21 on v5r4? > Or better yet has anyone upgraded their OS to v5r4 and are running older > System21     

Group: comp.sys.ibm.as400.misc · Group Profile · Search for Geace in comp.sys.ibm.as400.misc
Author: Barb
Date: Oct 1, 2007 15:08

Barb wrote: We are getting ready to upgrade our iSeries to v5r4 from v5r2. We're running an older version of Geac System21 - v3.5.2b and Geac System21 Explorer v3.5.1 (Sept 2001 release). Does anyone know if there will be a problem with our System21 on v5r4? Or better yet has anyone upgraded their OS to v5r4 and are running older System21 software? What problems were encountered
Show full article (1.38Kb) · Show article thread
Hi Martin, I have a feeling that some sort of branch to R12 took place. PSW AND REGISTERS OF ENDING TASK PSW 078D2000 AE22170C GR 0-7 00000000 00A55540 000000E0 0088A1A8 000004E0 0000020B 000000D5 001D7D28 8-F 00000020 00A5D800 04850902 801D6D28 2E22170C 00796798 801D6D50 001D13A0 I have only a partial dump to look at so I will check out the other addresses     

Group: comp.sys.ibm.as400.misc · Group Profile · Search for Geace in comp.sys.ibm.as400.misc
Author: xyzzy
Date: Oct 1, 2007 10:59

Thanks for that info. I'm going to pass this off to the client who is in communication with the vendor. Mike -----Original Message----- From: owner-vse-l@Lehigh.EDU [mailto:owner-vse-l@Lehigh.EDU] On Behalf Of Kevin Corkery Sent: September 19, 2007 12:03 PM To: VSE Discussion List Subject: Re: Abend in z/VSE GEAC program I have a subroutine that called $IJBCJC in order to set the return
Show full article (1.11Kb) · Show article thread
Hi Randy, >From CA-FAQS DSPLY 22170C I see the following: ====> ASID=S SVA P=ISTAICIR+000005C4 0022170C AR 982CD01C * q..** 00000000 00221710 05EF05E0 58C0E03C 47F0C5D8 41F00004 *...\..\..0EQ.0..* +00000004 00221720 58E0D00C 981CD018 07FE000F 00140000 *.\..q*..........* +00000014 00221730 FFFFFFF0     

Group: comp.sys.ibm.as400.misc · Group Profile · Search for Geace in comp.sys.ibm.as400.misc
Author: Barb
Date: Oct 1, 2007 04:25

Hello, I don't think it is in the SVA. I did a LIBR LD SDL and checking the output I see the last phase in the SVA with the highest address is $JOBCTLN at 05618678. From the MAP command I see: AR 0015 SPACE AREA V-SIZE GETVIS V-ADDR UNUSED NAME ... AR 0015 S SVA-31 13732K 3676K 4600000 This address "2E22170C" seems way too high to be in the SVA
Show full article (0.46Kb) · Show article thread
Since IBM has moves some SVA phases to 31bit with each release, if the vendor code is sending a "dirty" 24bit address it would not have shown up in earlier versions of VSE. Tony Thigpen -----Original Message ----- From: Randy Evans Sent: 09/19/2007 10:56 AM > The abend address (2E22170C) is well beyond the top of the 50M partition, which would indicate the code involved is an SVA     

Group: bit.listserv.vsel · Group Profile · Search for Geace in bit.listserv.vsel
Author: Horlick, Michael
Date: Sep 19, 2007 11:25

The abend address (2E22170C) is well beyond the top of the 50M partition, which would indicate the code involved is an SVA module. I am not at all familiar with the application involved (GEAC or whatever it's called), but my first guess would be that a payroll application would not include its own SVA modules. Also, the fact that the abend occurs while it is running AMODE31 rules out the problem
Show full article (1.42Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: bit.listserv.vsel · Group Profile · Search for Geace in bit.listserv.vsel
Author: Horlick, Michael
Date: Sep 19, 2007 10:24

Show full article (1.12Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: bit.listserv.vsel · Group Profile · Search for Geace in bit.listserv.vsel
Author: Horlick, Michael
Date: Sep 19, 2007 10:23

Show full article (1.47Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: bit.listserv.vsel · Group Profile · Search for Geace in bit.listserv.vsel
Author: Horlick, Michael
Date: Sep 19, 2007 08:59

Show full article (4.35Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: bit.listserv.vsel · Group Profile · Search for Geace in bit.listserv.vsel
Author: Tony Thigpen
Date: Sep 19, 2007 08:44

Show full article (3.46Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: bit.listserv.vsel · Group Profile · Search for Geace in bit.listserv.vsel
Author: Randy Evans
Date: Sep 19, 2007 07:57

Show full article (3.15Kb) · Show article thread
1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · next