On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 17:09:11 +0000 (UTC), Bible@Believer.org wrote: In alt.religion.christian swa@ozemail.com.au <swager@ozemail.com.au> wrote: The Atheist only has faith in the Evolutionary scientist.  He can't prove it. I have tried to think this issue through little by little and prayerfully since I came into this newsgroup, One of my first postings was on the

In alt.religion.christian swa@ozemail.com.au <swager@ozemail.com.au> wrote: The Atheist only has faith in the Evolutionary scientist.  He can't prove it. I have tried to think this issue through little by little and prayerfully since I came into this newsgroup, One of my first postings was on the fact that only living produces living. Therefore there had to be a living

On Aug 19, 9:05 am, Dave Oldridge wrote: swa...@ozemail.com.au wrote On Aug 18, 1:04 am, Dave Oldridge  wrote: swa...@ozemail.com.au wrote : <snip> Inspiration is not amanuensis.  That is to say, the Bible is no materia "channelled" from God. I have read that there are more manuscripts and part manuscripts in existence for parts of the Bible than

On Jun 10, 4:23 pm, "KiwiBrian" wrote: swa...@ozemail.com.au wrote in message On Jun 9, 5:01 pm, "KiwiBrian" wrote: swa...@ozemail.com.au> wrote <You have not told me how what I have given 'is misleading and deceitful'. By maintaining that the thousands of examples of biota that are native to New Zealand, and ONLY New Zealand, and which cannot swim one yard

On Apr 14, 12:52 am, "Sarah Banick" <sban...@mindspring.com> wrote: "george" <gpolkow...@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:d005c7f2-f8bb-441b-b885-9915b66f4024@24g2000hsh.googlegroups.com... On Apr 13, 12:51 pm, "Mike....." <mikeyscloth...@freedomnames.co.uk> wrote: Following up to VainGlorious If I was feeble and opted for a bus tour (still not likely, but I'm