... goes on in any stock market in the world? Aren't you seeing how very, very real it is - in some cases painfully real - right now? We're seeing how the Fed is using taxpayer money via regressive stagflation to make it as painless as possible for the rich. They'll do _anything_ rather than admit that free speech is a precondition of a free market economy. Bret Cahill
...your comment that the market fell from 6000 to 2000 in China. The connection between that and the *real world* where people work, do business, and buy food is utterly void. Not to those who were invested in the market - and to a considerable extent many ordinary Chinese were. Nope, fuck all ...
...re your comment that the market fell from 6000 to 2000 in China. The connection between that and the *real world* where people work, do business, and buy food is utterly void. Not to those who were invested in the market - and to a considerable extent many ordinary Chinese were. But you could tell ...
... your comment that the market fell from 6000 to 2000 in China. The connection between that and the *real world* where people work, do business, and buy food is utterly void. Not to those who were invested in the market - and to a considerable extent many ordinary Chinese were. But you could tell ...
... this 60%% drop is a sign that the system is working correctly, yes? <smile> Yes, in a way it is. However the real ... Japan, in the 1990's. The Japanese stock market has still not recovered from that debacle. All of this raises many - but really ... in China. The connection between that and the *real world* where people work, do business, and buy food is utterly void. imho
...of the capitalist model, don't we? Surely this 60%% drop is a sign that the system is working correctly, yes? <smile> Yes, in a way it is. However the real question is how "natural" was the ... to the other Asian economies, including Japan, in the 1990's. The Japanese stock market has still not recovered from that debacle. All of this raises many - but really other - questions. I'm just ...
....SS Fred Weiss ------------------------------------ Yes Fred, but we need to take the long term view of such natural corrections in the markets role of the capitalist model, don't we? Surely this 60%% drop is a sign that the system is working correctly, yes? <smile> Unless of course, one was a few weeks from retirement and couldn't wait any longer to cash in their stocks. :)
On Sep 15, 8:06Â pm, Fred Weiss <fredwe...@papertig.com> wrote: On Sep 15, 4:43Â pm, Shrikeb...@gmail.com wrote: On Sep 15, 12:02Â pm, Bret Cahill <BretCah...@aol.com> wrote: How many financial institutions must go under before a broad majority of monied interests admits I'm correct, that a vibrant market economy is 100%% dependent on free speech on economic issues...
On Sep 15, 4:43Â pm, Shrikeb...@gmail.com wrote: On Sep 15, 12:02Â pm, Bret Cahill <BretCah...@aol.com> wrote: How many financial institutions must go under before a broad majority of monied interests admits I'm correct, that a vibrant market economy is 100%% dependent on free speech on economic issues? Since you have already determined to your satisfaction that China ...
On Sep 15, 12:02Â pm, Bret Cahill <BretCah...@aol.com> wrote: How many financial institutions must go under before a broad majority of monied interests admits I'm correct, that a vibrant market economy is 100%% dependent on free speech on economic issues? Since you have already determined to your satisfaction that China has "free speech on economic issues," can we assume that we know...
